'ACTA a web police project' - MEP who wants to kill bill - News and Current Events | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


'ACTA a web police project' - MEP who wants to kill bill
Updated: Views / Replies:205 / 0
Created: by kbit Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

'ACTA a web police project' - MEP who wants to kill bill

  #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,872 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,301 given, 3,332 received

'ACTA a web police project' - MEP who wants to kill bill

ACTA is aiming high, but its loose wording would make internet service providers an unintended police force of the web, David Martin, the MEP rapporteur on the controversial agreement told RT in an exclusive interview.

*The trade agreement needs the consent of the European Parliament to come into force. A vote on it is due this summer, but David Martin who is responsible for monitoring its progress and reporting on it to the European Parliament has already said it should be rejected.


RT: What exactly worries you about the ACTA agreement?

David Martin: In terms of what ACTA was trying to achieve, I’m quite happy with it. I think it’s important that Europe does protect its intellectual property.

But it had a number of unintended consequences. One was it would put a duty on internet service providers to effectively act as a European police force of the internet. I don’t think that’s right. I think that’s for the formal judicial authorities.

Second, I did not like the idea that ACTA could possibly have criminalized young people who are quite innocently downloading films and music in the privacy of their own homes. ACTA says it should only be for commercial purposes, but “commercial purposes” are very weakly defined.

My third concern was that this was a treaty with a limited number of countries, 37, all of them very significant countries, but it excludes China, India and Russia. I think we should have gone for a multilateral settlement.

RT:Your recommendation might kill ACTA, but plans for a replacement have already been leaked. Do you think your concerns will be taken into account?

DM: I hope so. One of the things we need to do in any future treaty is to separate two very different kinds of goods.

ACTA tried to deal with counterfeit goods – real physical goods – in the same treaty as it dealt with internet goods, the virtual [ones]. I don’t think the two are meant for the same treatment.

The “counterfeit” generally means that someone has been coned. They have been presented with a good as if it was an original. [People would buy] that good thinking it was an original.

That is very different from someone downloading a tune on the internet, where they know who the product is coming from. So they are different concepts and they should be treated differently.

I think we also need situation where we move toward world agreement in terms of how we handle intellectual property.

People often say it’s an equivalent of going into the record store and stealing a CD, going on to the internet and stealing a tune. I don’t believe they are the same.

I think they are very different concepts. I think we have to try and preserve any future changes, the right of access to the internet, with compensation, with benefits for the rights holders.

RT: What do you think of the apparent haste and secrecy, with which most European governments signed up to ACTA, despite its flaws?

DM: It is the other concern people have about it. It was negotiated over a five to six year period behind closed doors. The rights holders seem to be involved in that discussion, but the civil society [was not] a part of that discussion.

Most member states apparently did not really understand what they were signing up for. I mean, the British House of Commons had a one-line report on ACTA, which said that ACTA did not merit a debate on the floor of the House of Commons.

It actually demonstrates the importance of the European Parliament in the European decision-making process. Because without the European Parliament ACTA would probably now be law and we wouldn’t be having this discussion.

RT:Despite all of ACTA's faults, the protection of intellectual property is a critical issue for Europe. Could it be that security it would bring would outweigh its shortcomings?

DM: I do think Europe has a duty to protect its intellectual property.

Europe is not rich in raw materials; we cannot compete on the global scale on the basis of low wages, so we compete on the basis of our innovation and our invention. We have to protect that innovation and invention in the global marketplace.

But ACTA didn’t, in my opinion, achieve that. It was described as a “coalition of the willing”. [It] only involved countries that already have very high levels of intellectual protection.

Indeed the great boost that virtually every member state has signed up for ACTA is that it doesn’t change the domestic law. Well, if it doesn’t change the domestic law, what benefit does it bring?

Of course the argument brings international cooperation. But that international cooperation, I think, has to be done on regulated basis, has to be done on multilateral basis.

It cannot be done behind closed doors by selected group of countries, a self-selected group of countries.

*
Acta-vism

*ACTA is an international agreement aimed at protecting intellectual property. It somewhat resembles the US’s Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), which was shelved by lawmakers after protests.

The US, most of the EU, Australia, Canada, Japan and several other countries have signed the ACTA treaty, but none of these signatories has yet ratified it. This last step would make the agreement viable. As soon as ACTA is ratified by any six countries, the convention will come into force.

ACTA sparked anger among Europeans, with thousands protesting against giving big firms the power to ban people from using the Internet for illegally swapping files. Twenty-two countries in the bloc signed up to the agreement, with a vote on its ratification due this summer in Brussels.


'ACTA a web police project' - MEP who wants to kill bill — RT

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > 'ACTA a web police project' - MEP who wants to kill bill

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Jigsaw Trading: TBA

Elite only

FuturesTrader71: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

Jan 18

RandBots: TBA

Jan 23

GFF Brokers & CME Group: Futures & Bitcoin

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Even worse than SOPA: New CISPA cybersecurity bill will censor the Web kbit News and Current Events 0 April 3rd, 2012 08:28 PM
Anonymous calls for anti-ACTA rallies, Poland suspends bill kbit News and Current Events 0 February 4th, 2012 02:41 PM
An ACTA of war: Secret censor tool to shake up world wide web kbit News and Current Events 0 January 24th, 2012 10:02 PM
House backer withdraws Web anti-piracy bill kbit News and Current Events 0 January 20th, 2012 02:14 PM
Senate Passes Bill Allowing Indefinite Detention of Americans ... Considers Bill Auth Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 November 29th, 2011 11:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-18 in 0.08 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.196.201.241