Good freedom, bad freedom: Irony of cybersecurity - News and Current Events | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Good freedom, bad freedom: Irony of cybersecurity
Updated: Views / Replies:505 / 0
Created: by kbit Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Good freedom, bad freedom: Irony of cybersecurity

  #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
 
kbit's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,872 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,301 given, 3,332 received

Good freedom, bad freedom: Irony of cybersecurity

US lawmakers are having another go at regulating the Internet, despite the recent embarrassing climbdown, when public outrage saw anti-piracy plans shelved. With a new cybersecurity bill, CISPA, activists fear their nightmares may now be realized.

­The US government continues spending millions of dollars to support freedom of the Internet around the world. But is it freedom for all?

The whistleblower website WikiLeaks, which to many has become the symbol of Internet freedom, has been under fire from US officials and lawmakers.

“Because WikiLeaks published documents which embarrassed the American government in many ways, WikiLeaks becomes the enemy,” a former employee of the US State Department, Peter van Buren, told RT.

The US has reportedly issued a secret indictment against Julian Assange, the head of the website which leaked hundreds of thousands of documents, revealing embarrassing details about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Five major US financial institutions – VISA, MasterCard, PayPal, Western Union and the Bank of America – have tried to economically strangle WikiLeaks by blocking donations to the website.

Until recently, Peter van Buren, served as a Foreign Service officer at the State Department. He says he was fired over the book and the blog that he wrote about the failure of US policies in Iraq.

“The State Department since 2008 has spent $76 million overseas on Internet freedom, giving tools and support to bloggers and journalists and online people around the world, particularly in countries that we have difficulties with,” he said.

“At the same time, the State Department… has found Internet freedom to be inconvenient in the form of WikiLeaks, and has worked just as hard and probably spent even more money trying to shut down free speech that it opposes, while supporting free speech that it feels furthers America’s own political goals overseas. We call that hypocrisy.”
But it is not just the whistleblowing websites that the US is after, but also their sources. Critics say this administration has embarked on an unprecedented campaign against whistleblowers.

“In this culture, where this administration is going after whistleblowers in an unprecedented way, we all have an obligation to protect our sources,” says Jeremy Scahill, an investigative journalist. “I myself, I’m really nervous about the safety of some of the people that I’ve talked to. As a national security journalist who covers national security, I’m talking all the time with people who are in the intelligence and the military community.”

While trying to stifle inconvenient leaks at home, the US perceives the Internet and social networking platforms as major tools for spreading democracy, and spends millions of dollars to help people in the Middle East and China get around Internet-blocking firewalls.

At the same time, ironically enough, American companies provide Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait with the technology to effectively block websites.

“A lot of the tools of control that are used by the so-called repressive governments are provided by American companies,” Peter van Buren explains. “The difference is that corporations, for better or worse, talk about profit as their motivation. However, the American government talks about freedom and democracy as its motivation, when in fact in many ways it seems to act in the opposite direction.”

Some argue that if left uncontrolled, the export of surveillance and site-blocking tools by American companies could undermine Internet freedom in the same way as arms exports undermine peace initiatives. And as far as the US government efforts to secure Internet freedom go, they seem to discern two different kinds of freedom: the freedom they encourage and the freedom that they punish…

Good freedom, bad freedom: Irony of cybersecurity — RT

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > Good freedom, bad freedom: Irony of cybersecurity

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Linda Bradford Raschke: Reading The Tape

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

January

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The U.N. Threat to Internet Freedom kbit News and Current Events 0 February 21st, 2012 09:05 PM
A Journey to Freedom sorge2000 Trading Journals 17 October 2nd, 2011 05:05 PM
Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) cory Psychology and Money Management 8 September 17th, 2011 03:15 PM
Jagui's journal to freedom jagui Trading Journals 71 October 8th, 2010 08:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 AM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-12 in 0.06 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.145.51.250