Goldman, Landesbank argue CDOs in US appeals court - News and Current Events | futures trading

Go Back

> Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Traders Hideout > News and Current Events

Goldman, Landesbank argue CDOs in US appeals court
Started:March 30th, 2012 (08:32 PM) by kbit Views / Replies:175 / 0
Last Reply:March 30th, 2012 (08:32 PM) Attachments:0

Welcome to

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Thread Tools Search this Thread

Goldman, Landesbank argue CDOs in US appeals court

Old March 30th, 2012, 08:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,839 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,275 given, 3,321 received

Goldman, Landesbank argue CDOs in US appeals court

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court was asked on Friday to decide whether Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYS:GS - News) and TCW Asset Management Co should have foreseen the housing market implosion that caused a $37 million loss for German state-owned Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg.

A three-judge panel on Friday did not make an immediate ruling on a trial judge's decision last September to dismiss the German bank's lawsuit claiming fraud against Goldman (NYS:GS - News) and TCW, an investment advisor.

The lawsuit was brought over a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) named Davis Square Funding VI, which was managed and marketed by Goldman and TCW at the height of the housing bubble when profits were potentially lucrative. The lawsuit was filed in October 2010, about four years after Davis Square closed.

It is one of the few cases to reach the appellate court level in which a sophisticated investor has accused a bank of profiting unjustly by being negligent in marketing and selling the product. Landesbank also accused Goldman of betting against its own derivative product that was riddled with risky residential mortgage-backed securities.

In dismissing the case, U.S. District Judge William Pauley in New York had said the allegations against Goldman and TCW were "sparse and lack particulars" and speculated on events occurring long after Davis Square closed.

Judges on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also zeroed in on whether Landesbank should have more carefully scrutinized what it was buying.

"What does the record show about your client's diligence in the housing market during this period?" Judge Susan Carney asked Landesbank lawyer Arthur Miller.

Miller responded that there was "no way of having equal information to Goldman," describing the investment bank as the "emperor" of financial institutions.

Miller told the panel that Goldman knew what information the ratings agencies and the top market regulator, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, had about the quality of the underlying mortgages in the investment pool.

The CDO's underlying portfolio comprised about 95 percent RMBS, which went on to lose value as the housing market crashed in 2007 and 2008, contributing to a global economic crisis. The German bank's lawsuit said it lost its investment of $37 million.

"They know that representing them as triple-A securities is false," Miller said, referring to the highest debt rating for a security.
The judges also queried Goldman's lawyer about what it knew at the time about the securities and the risks to its client.

Goldman lawyer Theodore Edelman told the panel that the firm's disclosures were "extremely clear and specific" and that the SEC website had timely information on loan delinquencies.
"All of this is available by a click of the mouse," Edelman said.

In court papers, Goldman said Landesbank relied on a late 2007 report by Clayton Holdings, a provider of due diligence services to the mortgage industry. The report referred to loans that Clayton examined in 2006 and 2007, but the loans backing Davis Square were originated primarily in 2004 and 2005.

One legal expert said that since the mortgages at issue were dated several years before the housing crisis, Goldman should be able to successfully defend the appeal.

"Back then, securitization was going great guns and we were a good 18 months away from the meltdown in the market," said Tony Plath, law professor at the University of North Carolina in Charlotte.

Landesbank accused Goldman of profiting unjustly from Davis Square by charging an excessively high purchase price and fees. It said Goldman also bet against the product by buying billions of dollars in credit default swaps that insured Goldman against the collapse of the mortgage securities collateral it sold to Landesbank.

In 2010, the SEC sued Goldman and a vice president of the firm over another CDO, called Abacus 2007-AC1, accusing them of failing to tell investors the Paulson & Co hedge fund helped choose and bet against the subprime RMBS underlying Abacus.

Goldman settled with the SEC for $550 million without admitting wrongdoing. The case against the executive, Fabrice Tourre, is ongoing.

The case is Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg vs Goldman Sachs and TCW Asset Management Co, 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New York

Goldman, Landesbank argue CDOs in US appeals court - Yahoo! Finance

Reply With Quote

Reply > Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Traders Hideout > News and Current Events > Goldman, Landesbank argue CDOs in US appeals court

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

NinjaTrader 8: Programming Profitable Trading Edges w/Scott Hodson

Elite only

Anthony Drager: Executing on Intermarket Correlations & Order Flow, Part 2

Elite only

Adam Grimes: Five critically important keys to professional trading

Elite only

Machine Learning Concepts w/FIO member NJAMC

Elite only

MarketDelta Cloud Platform: Announcing new mobile features

Dec 1

NinjaTrader 8: Features and Enhancements

Dec 6

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Appeals court weighs next steps in BofA mortgage deal kbit News and Current Events 0 February 15th, 2012 07:05 PM
Citigroup sued for fraud over $1 billion of CDOs kbit News and Current Events 0 January 24th, 2012 08:53 PM
Appeals court dismisses suit over new CFTC rule kbit News and Current Events 0 January 21st, 2012 02:50 PM
Appeals court to review BofA $8.5 billion MBS pact kbit News and Current Events 0 December 27th, 2011 05:30 PM
US Appeals Court Rejects Obama Health Care Law Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 August 12th, 2011 02:30 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Copyright © 2016 by All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts

Page generated 2016-10-27 in 0.11 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP