1962 'Law' That Predicts Employment And Growth - News and Current Events | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading

1962 'Law' That Predicts Employment And Growth
Updated: Views / Replies:332 / 0
Created: by kbit Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Thread Tools Search this Thread

1962 'Law' That Predicts Employment And Growth

  #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
Aurora, Il USA
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: futures
kbit's Avatar
Posts: 5,884 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 3,303 given, 3,334 received

1962 'Law' That Predicts Employment And Growth

Over the last few weeks, we've witnessed a back-and-forth between economists and financial journalists over Okun's Law—an economic ratio between unemployment and growth discovered by Arthur Okun in 1962.

In particular, some analysts have argued that the law might have been broken, and that employment growth no longer requires huge jumps in economic growth. This paints a rosy picture for employment—who cares if we're generating slow growth because everyone has a job?

At the same time, other economists are pouring cold water on this optimism, either by saying that Okun's Law isn't worth much anyway or that we're only seeing a very temporary change in the historical relationship.

But before we discuss the controversy, let's dig a little deeper into what Okun's Law actually is. In a nutshell, Okun found that the unemployment rate and the difference between potential GDP growth and real GDP growth interacted in a specific relationship over time. In other words:

Please register on futures.io to view futures trading content such as post attachment(s), image(s), and screenshot(s).

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Note that 4.0 is used for potential GDP growth, at least in the Federal Reserve's study of the theory. Okun's coefficient is -0.30—the relationship he witnessed and wrote about in his 1962 paper.
It's not a perfect fit, but in general the relationship seems to hold true:

Please register on futures.io to view futures trading content such as post attachment(s), image(s), and screenshot(s).

Wall Street Pit

In reality, this relationship is slightly absurd. Economic growth does not need to have such a close relationship with employment growth, but it's one of those relationships that just seems to work out. Indeed, different countries have and often stick to their own Okun coefficients.

The recent controversy started when WSJ's Jon Hilsenraith pointed out that the relationship is not holding up right now. The 0.9 percent fall in unemployment we witnessed last quarter should have been commensurate with something like 5% GDP growth, not the paltry 1.6 percent growth we saw over the same period. To give you an idea, that falls slightly outside of the center cluster of points on the graph above (WSJ has a graphical representation).

Economists (and even Hislenraith himself) were quick to point out that this discovery was, at best, circumstantial, for the following reasons:
These points all hold merit...until you see the following graph put forth by Wall Street Pit's Tim Duy. He plots both the three-year rolling averages of Okun's coefficient (blue) against the ten-year rolling averages of Okun's coefficient (red) calculated from historical data:

Please register on futures.io to view futures trading content such as post attachment(s), image(s), and screenshot(s).

Wall Street Pit

While the three-year coefficient is pretty volatile, the 10-year coefficient is not, and indeed suggests that there is something groundbreaking going on with this old relationship, and this isn't just a passing fad. The graph suggests that recently, the coefficient has more closely resembled -0.5 than -0.3.

If this is the case, then unemployment is becoming far less sensitive to changes in GDP growth. It implies that in the recession, we lost far fewer jobs than we should have based on GDP growth.

It also indicates renewing growth per se is less important to the health of the economy than we thought before. Finally, it suggests that current economic forecasts based on relationships between GDP growth and employment may be just plain wrong. Clearly, this is a chart that bulls should pull out at every possible moment.

But is this change in the relationship for real? Duy thinks there might be at least short-term relevance for the relationship:

Will the old Okun’s Law soon reassert itself? I don’t know, but looking at the ten-year trend suggests that we could continue to see fairly solid job growth even in a environment of relatively tepid GDP growth.
As for short-term applications of Okun's law, like the quarterly evaluation conducted by Hilsenraith, he argues that they quite frequently just don't hold up:

And that is what we call job security for reporters and economists alike.

Read more: What Is Okun's Law

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to kbit for this post:


futures io > > > > 1962 'Law' That Predicts Employment And Growth

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Wyckoff Hunting for Great Risk/Reward Ratio w/Gary Fullett

Elite only

Digging into the Details of iSystems w/Stage 5 & iSystems

Jun 5

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Groundhog Punxsutawney Phil 'predicts' 6 more weeks of winter GridKing Off-Topic 1 February 2nd, 2012 12:26 PM
Guest Post: The Real Employment Situation Report Quick Summary News and Current Events 1 December 3rd, 2011 10:19 AM
Improving Employment or Dead Cat Bounce Quick Summary News and Current Events 1 November 5th, 2011 10:40 AM
JPMorgan Warns Of An Even More Disappointing Employment Index kbit News and Current Events 0 August 1st, 2011 06:49 PM
US Employment Seen Falling, Private Hiring Tepid Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 September 3rd, 2010 02:20 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Copyright © 2018 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2018-05-27 in 0.09 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP