NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Which performance report is most accurate?


Discussion in MultiCharts

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one ABCTG with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    2. looks_two SydAlgoTrader with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 forgiven with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 mitty with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    1. trending_up 1,313 views
    2. thumb_up 0 thanks given
    3. group 4 followers
    1. forum 3 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Which performance report is most accurate?

  #1 (permalink)
mitty
Christchurch, New Zealand
 
Posts: 10 since Mar 2018
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 0

Can anyone explain why performance reports for the same signal differ between Portfolio Trader and when the signal is applied to the chart?

Currently using both with default settings. The difference in reports is fairly sizeable, to the point where a signal may be profitable in one but not in the other.

Which is most realistic?

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Cheap historycal L1 data for stocks
Stocks and ETFs
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
 
  #2 (permalink)
 
forgiven's Avatar
 forgiven 
Fletcher NC
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: nijia trader
Broker: A.M.P. I.Q. ....C.Q.G.
Trading: ym es
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Days
Posts: 862 since Mar 2012
Thanks Given: 287
Thanks Received: 581

when any signal fires there is some lag . then the trade has to be executed in the live market. most use market orders depending on the market depth and how many other traders are trading that signal there can be a lot of slippage . .then you add in commission on all the trades .. that makes a lot of bolts unprofitable in the real world . the back testing looks good . big banks trading with blots have there systems trading next door to the exchange and do not even pay commissions . that get payed for just trading ..

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)
SydAlgoTrader
Sydney new south Wales
 
Posts: 15 since Sep 2018
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 10


I would check the historical fill resolution both backtests.

If you're using limit orders you could see a lot of variation depending on how you determine historic fills are made.
Alternatively one backtest might include slippage/commissions and the other might not, which could be adversely affecting the results.

It would help if you can tell us more about the strategy, i.e what types of orders and the timeframe youre using.

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)
 ABCTG   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 2,436 since Apr 2013
Thanks Given: 482
Thanks Received: 1,629

mitty,

in general testing on a chart allows using the bar magnifier, which is not available for the Portfolio Trader.
Depending on your code using the bar magnifier can give you a more accurate back test or in other words you could see an overly optimistic test result without it.

Why the results differ on your end is hard to guess without knowing the exact settings and strategy. If your strategy uses intrabar order generation for example, which is not available
for the Portfolio Trader, this could cause quite a different outcome.

Regards,

ABCTG

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote




Last Updated on February 18, 2019


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts