Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I'm not sure what the "," in the results is for! Near 100% win on 40+ trades per period leads me to think the results are not accurate! I'm not slamming your system, I hope for nothing but the best for your trading. The results just look unrealistic.
I'll do some research, I'm interested in learning but I'm not an expert on Multicharts. I have used Ninja for the past 5 years.
"," is Swedish decimal ".". This file is just an example.
My problem is that I do not know how to read the results!
I get some rows with different optimized values for my parameters. Witch one should I use?
use for what? The WFO basically tests your signal on a set of data then applies the found results to a set of data
not included in the first set. Then moves forward using a different set of data for the optimization (depending if you are using anchored or unanchored optimzation) and a new out of sample set etc..
This means you will end up with different results for each in sample/out of sample dataset.
There is a lot of theory on WFO here on futures.io and going through it will likely answer your questions.
if you compare Net Profit / Max Drawdown the results of the optimisation is not that good. You can set the optimisation to Custom Criteria and look for this function, if you get values over 3+ using this function is usually a decent risk reward.
As Joel stated, the NetProfit/Drawdown are way too high, especially in the OS period
One thing that bug me:
In the first line, the Gross Loss is way under the DrawDown, meaning that your system maybe waiting a little too long to take a lost
