Multicharts with .Net - futures io
futures io



Multicharts with .Net


Discussion in MultiCharts

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Jura with 24 posts (21 thanks)
    2. looks_two TonyB with 12 posts (4 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Bimi with 9 posts (14 thanks)
    4. looks_4 tx413 with 9 posts (29 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one tx413 with 3.2 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Bimi with 1.6 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Jura with 0.9 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 andrewtrader with 0.9 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 48,812 views
    2. thumb_up 102 thanks given
    3. group 41 followers
    1. forum 141 posts
    2. attach_file 2 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 125,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Multicharts with .Net

(login for full post details)
  #101 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received


JackR View Post
I see you are a Ninja user as well as a MultiChart.Net user. As I understand it both use C# as their language of choice. How difficult would you say it will be to port an indicator (or system) between the two?

Yes, both use C# so a conversion is somewhat easier then when converting from PowerLanguage to NinjaScript or something similar.

But I honestly can't say how difficult it would be to port an indicator from NinjaTrader to MultiCharts .NET or vice versa - this depends on multiple factors. For example, your knowledge of C#, NinjaScript, MultiCharts .NET, the complexity of an indicator or strategy, whether this strategy uses something specific to the platform. And also how much time you can spend on trail-and-error. So I can't say 'oh this will be easy' or that it will be hard, since then I would be oversimplifying it.

But I think that, generally speaking, when one has a basic knowledge of C#, NinjaTrader and MultiCharts .NET, converting indicators or strategies will be relatively easy.

(Sorry for not giving a straight-forward answer ).

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Jura for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #102 (permalink)
Bimi
London
 
 
Posts: 118 since Mar 2010
Thanks: 42 given, 58 received


atata View Post
I don't own the .Net version. Got the same answer today as per T&S. T&S will be implemented in the future... well no time frame specified...

atata



Just use the T&S from Ninja.
Most people have an average of 4 charting software anyway...
What's the use of nagging? There is no T&S in MC. Accept the fact and get on with trading.
A few years ago, you cannot open too many software because of the limited computer resources.
With today's 64 bit computer and multi-core CPU and tons of RAM...
you can open 4 software and the computer won't blink.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #103 (permalink)
 andby 
Norwich, UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multiple:research&executi
Broker: Started with Stage5/OEC ... multiple
Trading: Anything found profitable goes ...
 
andby's Avatar
 
Posts: 160 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 87 given, 85 received

Does NT or MC/MC NET support the free intraday google finance data ?

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #104 (permalink)
 patbateman 
NY, NY
 
Experience: None
Platform: T4, NinjaTrader
Trading: All!
 
patbateman's Avatar
 
Posts: 235 since Mar 2012
Thanks: 113 given, 200 received


andrei View Post
Does NT or MC/MC NET support the free intraday google finance data ?

That data is not great. Yes NT supports it, but it is not tick data. NT also has free EOD data anyways. You can download lots of data from this website, or from demo feeds.

"A Jedi's strength flows from the force."
-Yoda
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to patbateman for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #105 (permalink)
 drolles 
London, UK
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TradeLink, OpenQuant, considering anything that works...
Trading: if it trades...
 
Posts: 94 since Oct 2010
Thanks: 24 given, 38 received

Hi,

Id greatly appreciate if anyone could share some views here?

Ive downloaded the evaluation version and taken a look.

Very early reactions
- (negative) Signals (or strategies) dont appear to be as event driven as OpenQuant / NT
- Can seem to work-out if you can apply a single strategy to multiple instruments (without having x charts and applying to each)
- Global variables appear need to be used to pass information between each instance of the strategies (running on each chat see above one strategy per instrument)
- Documentation needs a little bit of work (e.g. introduction video overviews of functions)
- Good integration with Visual Studio
- Overall, looks like a solid competitor in the market place now it has an industrial strength language at its core

Thanks,

drolles

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #106 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received


drolles View Post
Id greatly appreciate if anyone could share some views here?

I'm also wondering what the current opinion of futures.io (formerly BMT) users is of MultiCharts .NET. Do people use it? Are they satisfied with it, or found something better?

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #107 (permalink)
 cory 
the coin hunter
virginia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: ninja
Trading: NQ
 
cory's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,044 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 857 given, 7,916 received


Jura View Post
I'm also wondering what the current opinion of futures.io (formerly BMT) users is of MultiCharts .NET. Do people use it? Are they satisfied with it, or found something better?

did you read this?

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #108 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received


cory View Post
did you read this?

Yes, I did. But unless I read it wrong, that thread is about Mike moving from regular PowerLanguage-based MultiCharts to NinjaTrader. That doesn't say anything about the experiences with MultiCharts .NET.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Jura for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #109 (permalink)
 bibulous 
Germany
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: MultiCharts, NinjaTrader
Broker: IB/IQFeed
Trading: NQ, YM
 
Posts: 81 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 113 given, 63 received

I own MultiCharts.Net, MultiCharts and NinjaTrader (among other systems). And so far I am not too happy with it. Compared with NinjaScript PowerLanguage.NET is far too verbose. And IMHO not flexible enough. For me it currently it is only a nice frontend for discretionary trading. Although, I don't see much of a difference to the "regular" MC here...
For strategies I still rather do a quick prototype in PowerLanguage and the _maybe_ a version in NinjaScript.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to bibulous for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #110 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received


bibulous View Post
I own MultiCharts.Net, MultiCharts and NinjaTrader (among other systems). And so far I am not too happy with it. Compared with NinjaScript PowerLanguage.NET is far too verbose. And IMHO not flexible enough. For me it currently it is only a nice frontend for discretionary trading. Although, I don't see much of a difference to the "regular" MC here...
For strategies I still rather do a quick prototype in PowerLanguage and the _maybe_ a version in NinjaScript.

Hi Bibulous. Can you expand somewhat on what you mean with "not flexible enough"? And what are some of the things that NinjaTraders does better than MC .NET?

I'm asking to learn some of the important disadvantages of MC .NET in your view, to see if these are also important enough to me to use another platform alongside it.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #111 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received

For people who are currently contemplating buying MC .NET or not, this might be valuable to know:


Quoting 
Planned price increase for MultiCharts .NET

We get a lot of questions as to why MC .NET is cheaper than MultiCharts regular edition. The current price is 33% lower than regular version of MultiCharts it was designed to help introduce the product and give our customers a extra value.

The product has now been available for 5 months, and there is a planned price increase to match the regular MultiCharts edition. The price change will take effect on January 7th, 2013.

Source: Planned price increase for MultiCharts .NET MultiCharts Blog

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Jura for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #112 (permalink)
 TonyB 
Bay Area, CA - US
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TOS, TS & MC
Broker: TDA & TS
Trading: Stock, Options and now Futures (ES)
 
TonyB's Avatar
 
Posts: 516 since Dec 2010
Thanks: 227 given, 140 received


Jura View Post
For people who are currently contemplating buying MC .NET or not, this might be valuable to know:


Source: Planned price increase for MultiCharts .NET MultiCharts Blog

Thanks Jura. I just received the email also and was going to post the same...

If you have the .NET version, are you finding yourself using it more than the original, EL / PL one?

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #113 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received


TonyB View Post
If you have the .NET version, are you finding yourself using it more than the original, EL / PL one?

More or less the same I suppose. I use the regular MultiCharts now on a different pc just to plot some intraday charts, and the .NET version on the main pc for creating stuff.

But in regards to programming is PowerLanguage still something that I find easier and quicker than C#, but admittedly, lately I didn't had much time to study C#, so that didn't help either. Have you made the switch to the .NET version?

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Jura for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #114 (permalink)
 TonyB 
Bay Area, CA - US
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: TOS, TS & MC
Broker: TDA & TS
Trading: Stock, Options and now Futures (ES)
 
TonyB's Avatar
 
Posts: 516 since Dec 2010
Thanks: 227 given, 140 received


Jura View Post
More or less the same I suppose. I use the regular MultiCharts now on a different pc just to plot some intraday charts, and the .NET version on the main pc for creating stuff.

But in regards to programming is PowerLanguage still something that I find easier and quicker than C#, but admittedly, lately I didn't had much time to study C#, so that didn't help either. Have you made the switch to the .NET version?

Thank you Jura. No, I have not (made the switch to .NET). I've been curious how .NET might be different, but it truly seems that for my purposes, MC is ideal.

I still do all of my trading (stock, ETF, options and some futures) on the ThinkorSwim (TOS) platform by TD Ameritrade (TDA). I have several accounts there, all linked, so it just makes sense.

I don't have much in the way of a data source for MC, so I rarely even open it. I currently have equity data only for MC, but since that data (via Open E-Cry) is not as abundant as what TDA / TOS provides, I don't gravitate to MC, and use TOS only, which is pretty dang good.

I got MC at a discounted price and don't regret it though. The back-testing capabilities was a driving force, and I hope to make time to test current equity / option strategies and refine them with MC. Looks like MC got Volume Profile finally, which is great. I like how the platform is evolving and hope to use it someday soon. I have a 1 and 3 year old, so this hasn't been a priority...

Thanks Jura for your input.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to TonyB for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #115 (permalink)
 andby 
Norwich, UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multiple:research&executi
Broker: Started with Stage5/OEC ... multiple
Trading: Anything found profitable goes ...
 
andby's Avatar
 
Posts: 160 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 87 given, 85 received


Jura View Post
For people who are currently contemplating buying MC .NET or not, this might be valuable to know:


Source: Planned price increase for MultiCharts .NET MultiCharts Blog

Hi Jura,

I remember some time ago Multicharts had an offer $1994.00 for Multicharts & Multicharts .NET bundle lifetime, which is $500 lower than the current website offer.
It's worthwhile asking them if they still have that offer. In the light of planned price increase, that offer seems more attactive now.

Regards

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #116 (permalink)
avfx
Helsinki Finland
 
 
Posts: 7 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 0 given, 2 received

Since I've got this price increase stuff in my email from both MC and now through this forum due to subbing to the thread, I think I want to have my 2 cents on it.

And they are: Multicharts don't know much about marketing. Would have been better to just advertise the regular price and then advertise that there's an offer for limited time, rather than advertise the price x and then spam about raising the price by large %. That may be a fine approach in the US but I'm not in US and expect more clever marketing than that or it's just going to annoy me like the tone my posts will anyone who reads them (I write in annoyed tone when I'm annoyed, and I'm annoyed most of the time). The best marketing advise I can give is to set a regular price and have promotions that are irresistable - 75% off is a good one, but it needs to be very subtly and irregularly marketed like that so that it won't become an expectation and people won't go shouting out that "wait for X and it'll be 75% off", and ideally only price it like this for those who are otherwise lost cause - this might be harder to figure out but I pretty much told them what my offer is during a trial.

Now I don't even work in marketing but I'm a very reluctant customer and if it's free then it likely worthless, a very limited 75% off would on the other hand make it more of a "steal" and that's much more appealing assuming I think it might be worth something. Same could work for this forum as well. I'm tempted to see the "elite" section but it's hard to gauge what's in there. I know there's some Ninja indicators, but I don't use Ninja after hearing how buggy it is. I could use closer relations with traders and live chat and services (risk management) to avoid entering or being in trades at obviously (to more experience traders) bad times (I tend to see opportunity where there is none or where there is too high risk but don't have anyone to discuss it with).

In the end I decided to just code my own solution since all the solutions on the market are either too buggy or target a market in which they are too expensive, or use obscure language with poor debugger and so on.

The big issue with MC.NET from a C# dev (not professional) perspective was that it was not as simple as just making a change in code pressing a single key and getting the results, rather I had to attach VS to MC.NET and that's multi-step process, too much hassle for me. I'd rather have my strategy in it's own executable and use MC.NET as a library and visualization service.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to avfx for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #117 (permalink)
 masterchanger 
Chicago, IL
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: 3C,Multicharts
Broker: CQG, Binance.us, FTX.us
Trading: ES, currency futures,GC
 
masterchanger's Avatar
 
Posts: 18 since Aug 2011
Thanks: 32 given, 17 received

I bot the bundle deal this weekend and as such I am glad they didn't charge more from the start and allowed the 5 month for me to realize what I wanted to do vs. buying NT lifetime license. The exposure to the software products I received here on futures.io (formerly BMT) was very important in helping me make my choice. Thanks Big Mike for your software presentations and various webinars from the various vendors.

Now is the Time!
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #118 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received


avfx View Post
And they are: Multicharts don't know much about marketing.

(..)

Same could work for this forum as well. I'm tempted to see the "elite" section but it's hard to gauge what's in there.

If I understand you correctly, you buy products (whether it being a trading platform or an Elite membership) not based on the intrinsic value but based on the marketing quality? That seems a little odd to me, especially since marketing is most often just talk.

As you probably know, Mike's position with Elite memberships is that these are aimed at people who want to support the community regardless of the quality or quantity of the Elite Downloads. So it makes sense not to actively market or advertise this membership. And I'm glad for that, since that would probably turn must people off.


avfx View Post
In the end I decided to just code my own solution since all the solutions on the market are either too buggy or target a market in which they are too expensive, or use obscure language with poor debugger and so on.

The big issue with MC.NET from a C# dev (not professional) perspective was that it was not as simple as just making a change in code pressing a single key and getting the results, rather I had to attach VS to MC.NET and that's multi-step process, too much hassle for me.

True, MC .NET is not as simple as processing a single key. But you don't need to use VS if you don't want too, unless you want to debug. But then again, every debugger for every software requires you to attach to the running process. So it's not extra hassle compared with other platforms (NT for example).

I also fail to see how coding your own platform/software would be more simple and less hassle than buying existing software (regardless it being MC, NT, SC or any other platform).

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #119 (permalink)
 bnichols 
Dartmouth NS
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MC, MC.Net, NT, TWS
Broker: IB / IQFeed / Kids
Trading: Forex, stocks
 
bnichols's Avatar
 
Posts: 638 since Feb 2010
Thanks: 64 given, 460 received

For the record previously a diehard NT user I bought the MC bundle last year some time after .Net was released and started using MC immediately, which meant converting my custom indicators from NT C# to PowerLanguage (which meant learning PowerLanguage). Recently I started using MC .Net almost exclusively, mainly for the programming flexibility (specifically want to read files and interface to C# DLLs) and am in the process of converting custom indicators to PowerLanguage .Net (MC .Net's version of C#/VB).

I found MC's documentation sparse compared to NT's documentation (mainly a dearth of examples) although there are enough EasyLanguage examples on the internet (including futures.io (formerly BMT)) that I was never at a total loss. Not having a TradeStation subscription makes some things harder than they need to be, like maintaining reasonably up-to-date versions of ELCollections and ADE. I'm finding MC .Net's documentation even more sparse.

I upgraded to the latest version of MC .Net when it became available (MultiCharts .NET64 Version 8.5 Beta 2/Build 6526) and was initially chagrined to discover not all built-in functions & indicators were compiled, moreover would not compile, and ended up deleting the offenders rather than messing with them. Trust things like that will be fixed in the next release.

On that note, while both MC .Net and NT insist on compiling all uncompiled sources in the functions/indicators/signals folders when you try to compile new source code, unlike NT MC .Net will compile new source code and allow you to use it even though other source code still has issues.

No other issues so far aside from a couple of minor quirks (e.g., occasionally a recompiled indicator will not update on the charts automatically, needs to be removed and installed).

Overall I prefer MC to NT as a trader because in my experience MC is significantly more stable and PowerLanguage does pretty much what a trader needs it to do, not that I haven't managed to crash MC from time to time. As a programmer developing bots and doing research into market behaviour however I also need .Net functionality and expect MC .Net to provide that while maintaining the stability.

Edited to add: BTW, on the topic of MC .Net documentation I arrived on this thread just now via a Google search while trying to find out what the MC .Net C# equivalents of the PowerLanguage (current bar) "Date" and "Time" functions are Turns out to be Bars.Time[].

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #120 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received


bnichols View Post
No other issues so far aside from a couple of minor quirks (e.g., occasionally a recompiled indicator will not update on the charts automatically, needs to be removed and installed).

That is indeed an annoyance. Might be related to this Project Management issue: MC-1081 - Provide a workaround for detecting changes in functions, but sadly, I don't know a workaround for this.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #121 (permalink)
 bnichols 
Dartmouth NS
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MC, MC.Net, NT, TWS
Broker: IB / IQFeed / Kids
Trading: Forex, stocks
 
bnichols's Avatar
 
Posts: 638 since Feb 2010
Thanks: 64 given, 460 received


Jura View Post
That is indeed an annoyance. Might be related to this Project Management issue: MC-1081 - Provide a workaround for detecting changes in functions, but sadly, I don't know a workaround for this.

Roger that and there are other (what I would consider minor) annoyances, e.g., chart trading occasionally does not show open/historical orders when turned on until the workspace is closed and reopened.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #122 (permalink)
 andby 
Norwich, UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multiple:research&executi
Broker: Started with Stage5/OEC ... multiple
Trading: Anything found profitable goes ...
 
andby's Avatar
 
Posts: 160 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 87 given, 85 received


patbateman View Post
That data is not great. Yes NT supports it, but it is not tick data. NT also has free EOD data anyways. You can download lots of data from this website, or from demo feeds.

Hi patbateman,

Can you elaborate a little bit more ? As far as I see, neither NT nor Multicharts (or anything else, to be honest, other than AmiBroker) does not support a direct connection to either google finance or something else with free intraday. It may seem possible to load intraday from ASCII files, but not take it directly.

Thx

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #123 (permalink)
Ameoba
Hong Kong china
 
 
Posts: 1 since Jan 2013
Thanks: 0 given, 0 received


rienno View Post
I search the book review from Amazon.com and Google, found a lot of C# book with good comment.
But most of the name of book is C# with .NET, only the book C# 4.0 in a Nutshell doesn't with .NET

I am a beginner in programming, if I only need to write something for the trading platform like upcoming Multicharts.NET, do I need to learn the .NET as well?

Thanks!!!

Well, why don't you use powerLanguage?
BTW, are you from HongKong. I am also from HK and new to MC with Algo trading.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #124 (permalink)
 njetty 
Toronto, ON
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: None
Trading: Gold
 
Posts: 3 since Oct 2012
Thanks: 0 given, 0 received


avfx View Post
I'd rather have my strategy in it's own executable and use MC.NET as a library and visualization service.

I like this approach as well. I am a professional programmer evaluating trading platforms. There appear to be limitations, gotcha's with all of the retail products in regards to backtesting and live trading. What I really need is just a good visualization platform that I can plug into. I'm wondering if NT can be used as just a visualization tool. An interesting thought considering there is a free version.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #125 (permalink)
 andby 
Norwich, UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multiple:research&executi
Broker: Started with Stage5/OEC ... multiple
Trading: Anything found profitable goes ...
 
andby's Avatar
 
Posts: 160 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 87 given, 85 received


bnichols View Post
For the record previously a diehard NT user I bought the MC bundle last year some time after .Net was released and started using MC immediately, which meant converting my custom indicators from NT C# to PowerLanguage (which meant learning PowerLanguage). Recently I started using MC .Net almost exclusively, mainly for the programming flexibility (specifically want to read files and interface to C# DLLs) and am in the process of converting custom indicators to PowerLanguage .Net (MC .Net's version of C#/VB).

I found MC's documentation sparse compared to NT's documentation (mainly a dearth of examples) although there are enough EasyLanguage examples on the internet (including futures.io (formerly BMT)) that I was never at a total loss. Not having a TradeStation subscription makes some things harder than they need to be, like maintaining reasonably up-to-date versions of ELCollections and ADE. I'm finding MC .Net's documentation even more sparse.

I upgraded to the latest version of MC .Net when it became available (MultiCharts .NET64 Version 8.5 Beta 2/Build 6526) and was initially chagrined to discover not all built-in functions & indicators were compiled, moreover would not compile, and ended up deleting the offenders rather than messing with them. Trust things like that will be fixed in the next release.

On that note, while both MC .Net and NT insist on compiling all uncompiled sources in the functions/indicators/signals folders when you try to compile new source code, unlike NT MC .Net will compile new source code and allow you to use it even though other source code still has issues.

No other issues so far aside from a couple of minor quirks (e.g., occasionally a recompiled indicator will not update on the charts automatically, needs to be removed and installed).

Overall I prefer MC to NT as a trader because in my experience MC is significantly more stable and PowerLanguage does pretty much what a trader needs it to do, not that I haven't managed to crash MC from time to time. As a programmer developing bots and doing research into market behaviour however I also need .Net functionality and expect MC .Net to provide that while maintaining the stability.

Edited to add: BTW, on the topic of MC .Net documentation I arrived on this thread just now via a Google search while trying to find out what the MC .Net C# equivalents of the PowerLanguage (current bar) "Date" and "Time" functions are Turns out to be Bars.Time[].


Indeed, documentation in Multicharts NET needs some improvements. I would say even more, documentation overall should be better organized perhaps into specific documents covering various domain of interests, with not only syntax definition and one line samples, but more elaborate examples of utilization, etc. Currently, many times you go back searching on Google.
Still, one very nice aspect @ MC is the way they opened product/feature management to their clients. Basically you have direct access to a link where feature requests or bugs can be logged and progress can be tracked. More than that, you can see what is the general interest for specific features and vote, and you get feedback.
It's so much better than sending emails into a "black box" email address.

Regards

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #126 (permalink)
 Jura   is a Vendor
 
 
Jura's Avatar
 
Posts: 774 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2,347 given, 688 received


andby View Post
Indeed, documentation in Multicharts NET needs some improvements. I would say even more, documentation overall should be better organized perhaps into specific documents covering various domain of interests, with not only syntax definition and one line samples, but more elaborate examples of utilization, etc. Currently, many times you go back searching on Google.
(...)

Their programming/help guide has been released yesterday. See here.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Jura for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #127 (permalink)
 andby 
Norwich, UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multiple:research&executi
Broker: Started with Stage5/OEC ... multiple
Trading: Anything found profitable goes ...
 
andby's Avatar
 
Posts: 160 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 87 given, 85 received


Jura View Post
Their programming/help guide has been released yesterday. See here.

Big step ahead indeed
Hopefully, they won't stop here, and provide some more advanced docs as well.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to andby for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #128 (permalink)
 KhaosTrader 
San Jose
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader, Esignal
Trading: Stocks
 
Posts: 107 since Jan 2012
Thanks: 40 given, 21 received

I looked on the multicharts website today, and now they are giving away free version of the .net multichart. It can trade real and u can develop studies but you can only trade 2 instruments at a time (I think).

I wonder why they are doing this, I guess its good for getting the word out.. but I already bought the multicharts .net version a while back.. oh well...

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to KhaosTrader for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #129 (permalink)
 tx413 
Houston, TX
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multicharts, NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP Futures
Trading: ES
 
Posts: 23 since Aug 2010
Thanks: 42 given, 77 received


KhaosTrader View Post
I wonder why they are doing this, I guess its good for getting the word out.. but I already bought the multicharts .net version a while back.. oh well...

I think MC is starting to get a little wiser:
  1. They used to have the DT version that was free then cancelled it. It helped boost their tiny MC community, which they were too blind to see. They were only trying to copy what NinjaTrader was doing to try and keep some market share.
  2. Then they joined the modern world (several years late) and produced a .NET version.
  3. Then they realized that there's only about 5 MC users contributing to their MC.NET community.
  4. Then they looked at Ninjatrader, which has a gigantic user community with uncountable free indicators and strategies (this website has tons!).
  5. Then the light bulb went on: "Hey! We need a free version like NinjaTrader has so that people will start using our product! Then maybe we'll get some more users to contribute free stuff and build a community so people will stop flocking to NinjaTrader!!"

They're a little late to the game, as usual. Late to the game, but IMHO their product is still far more polished, stable, and modern looking than NT. Somebody needs to merge both NT and MC.NET. There's things I love and hate about both of them.

Reply With Quote
The following 4 users say Thank You to tx413 for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #130 (permalink)
 Jaba 
Austin TX
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: SaintGobain Crystal Ball
Trading: 6E
 
Posts: 81 since Oct 2010
Thanks: 102 given, 133 received

Do you know if MultiCharts has an ATI interface like NinjaTrader? I wonder how I would hook an external, signal-generating system to MC, and have it execute some orders... Any ideas?
J

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #131 (permalink)
 andrewtrader 
Lithuania
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MBT DesktopPro, Multicharts,NinjaTrader
Broker: MBT,CQG/AMP
Trading: Forex
 
Posts: 57 since May 2011
Thanks: 43 given, 31 received


andby View Post
Still, one very nice aspect @ MC is the way they opened product/feature management to their clients. Basically you have direct access to a link where feature requests or bugs can be logged and progress can be tracked. More than that, you can see what is the general interest for specific features and vote, and you get feedback.
It's so much better than sending emails into a "black box" email address.

I second that, indeed very appreciated, thanks MC. Wish everybody went this way, but who is first that one gets the cake

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #132 (permalink)
 andrewtrader 
Lithuania
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MBT DesktopPro, Multicharts,NinjaTrader
Broker: MBT,CQG/AMP
Trading: Forex
 
Posts: 57 since May 2011
Thanks: 43 given, 31 received


njetty View Post
I like this approach as well. I am a professional programmer evaluating trading platforms. There appear to be limitations, gotcha's with all of the retail products in regards to backtesting and live trading. What I really need is just a good visualization platform that I can plug into. I'm wondering if NT can be used as just a visualization tool. An interesting thought considering there is a free version.

yes, strategy as standalone exe is something I rave about for a long time. And yes, backtesting always has issues. So far I think MC (maybe also quanta) is the best.

did lots of dev and backtesting in NT. Conclusion on NT - unstable (StrategyAnalizer may hang live charts), unreliable, inaccurate (no intrabar by tick backtesting,etc.), inconsistent (compilation/libs/.net/whatever, support sends problems to blackhole as if you are the only idiot who have them), incapable (nt should pay pension to gomi) in some critical areas. If I had mc.net at the time would save much time and patience.

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to andrewtrader for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #133 (permalink)
 andrewtrader 
Lithuania
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: MBT DesktopPro, Multicharts,NinjaTrader
Broker: MBT,CQG/AMP
Trading: Forex
 
Posts: 57 since May 2011
Thanks: 43 given, 31 received


tx413 View Post
I think MC is starting to get a little wiser:
  • Then the light bulb went on: "Hey! We need a free version like NinjaTrader has so that people will start using our product! Then maybe we'll get some more users to contribute free stuff and build a community so people will stop flocking to NinjaTrader!!"

yes, pretty unwise policy they had forcing developers to buy product just to be able to develop indicators for MC (MC locks up after 30 days evaluation period ). I suggested developer license to them or just provide time-unrestricted version without live trading capability the way NT does. This idea seemed incomprehensible to some MC guy during futures.io (formerly BMT) webinar. Looks like they got a little bit wiser, but not much

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #134 (permalink)
 bibulous 
Germany
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: MultiCharts, NinjaTrader
Broker: IB/IQFeed
Trading: NQ, YM
 
Posts: 81 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 113 given, 63 received


Jura View Post
Hi Bibulous. Can you expand somewhat on what you mean with "not flexible enough"? And what are some of the things that NinjaTraders does better than MC .NET?

I'm asking to learn some of the important disadvantages of MC .NET in your view, to see if these are also important enough to me to use another platform alongside it.

Flexible was probably the wrong word - it is C# after all. It just is or "feels" more verbose. Too much objects, delegates wrapped around everything. Maybe I am exaggerating here, but I was really annoyed looking at it.. I look at it again with every new version, but it is still not for me...

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to bibulous for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #135 (permalink)
 moonriver 
boulder colorado usa
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: ninjatrader
Trading: fdax
 
Posts: 3 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 0 given, 1 received

Hi there,

I am just test driving MC .net these days and was wondering where to get additional indicators such as Donchian channel?
Support wants me to request it as an additional feature.
Maybe you guys have an idea or even the occasional study coded, sitting around somewhere ;-)

Cheers

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #136 (permalink)
 Porsche 
Germany
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Mathematica, thinkorswim
Broker: tastyworks, thinkorswim, Mathematica
Trading: ES, CL, 6E
 
Porsche's Avatar
 
Posts: 28 since Apr 2012
Thanks: 59 given, 17 received


moonriver View Post
Hi there,

I am just test driving MC .net these days and was wondering where to get additional indicators such as Donchian channel?
Support wants me to request it as an additional feature.
Maybe you guys have an idea or even the occasional study coded, sitting around somewhere ;-)

Cheers

The pre-built study call "Price_Channel" should do it.

You could also check this one: https://futures.io/local_links_sort.php?catid=19&filter=&sort=d&page=1&pp=30&keyid=184 and adapt it for MC.net

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #137 (permalink)
 moonriver 
boulder colorado usa
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: ninjatrader
Trading: fdax
 
Posts: 3 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 0 given, 1 received


Porsche View Post

Thanks a lot Porsche, that study sure is a beauty.

Yet, since I have no clue about coding, I will have to go the "goodwill"/pay route.
If you have any idea how to go about getting this done, let me know.

Have a nice WE

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to moonriver for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #138 (permalink)
 tx413 
Houston, TX
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multicharts, NinjaTrader
Broker: AMP Futures
Trading: ES
 
Posts: 23 since Aug 2010
Thanks: 42 given, 77 received

What's wrong with this one? I haven't tried it, to be honest.... [Edit:] Maybe because it's not .NET ...



You *did* do a search -- at least on this site -- for a donchian channel indicator before posting your request, didn't you? If not, Google is your friend. As always.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #139 (permalink)
 Porsche 
Germany
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Mathematica, thinkorswim
Broker: tastyworks, thinkorswim, Mathematica
Trading: ES, CL, 6E
 
Porsche's Avatar
 
Posts: 28 since Apr 2012
Thanks: 59 given, 17 received


moonriver View Post
Thanks a lot Porsche, that study sure is a beauty.

Yet, since I have no clue about coding, I will have to go the "goodwill"/pay route.
If you have any idea how to go about getting this done, let me know.

Have a nice WE

You could start to get some clue with this one and the C# tutorials out there: https://www.multicharts.com/downloads/MultiCharts.NET-ProgrammingGuide-v1.0.pdf

To port an indicator from NT to MC.net, as both are C#, you in principle only have to change the NinjaScript part to PowerLanguage.Net. When the study uses pre-build functions you also might have to change these.

As you are new to coding the best way might be to start with the MC.net "Price_Channel.Indicator.CS" save it under a new name and start to modify it step by step until you get what you want, using the NT indicator for guidance.

However you should reflect how much time, money, or "goodwill credit" you like to spend on beautiful lines.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #140 (permalink)
 andby 
Norwich, UK
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Multiple:research&executi
Broker: Started with Stage5/OEC ... multiple
Trading: Anything found profitable goes ...
 
andby's Avatar
 
Posts: 160 since Jul 2012
Thanks: 87 given, 85 received


tx413 View Post
What's wrong with this one? I haven't tried it, to be honest.... [Edit:] Maybe because it's not .NET ...



You *did* do a search -- at least on this site -- for a donchian channel indicator before posting your request, didn't you? If not, Google is your friend. As always.

I've heard this before - "google is your frend" ... I don't necessarily agree with that - for the moment it looks like it's not your enemy, but considering how much stuff it is taking away from you each time you search, I would not call it a friend, but rather a "too dangerously close friend"

Going back to Multicharts - I like the platform, still I wish though they paid more attention to their competition and have some more nice features like:

MC-1317
Zig-Zag Cumulative Volume - Weis Wave for Wyckoff fans
MC-1354
eSignal feature - Linked charts (showing same instrument but different timescale) - such that trend lines drawn in one chart appears on all other linked charts.
MC-1316
Investor RT like - Volume Profile - Creating Composite profiles with mouse selection.
MC-1355
eSignal feature like - for linked charts - mouse cross pointer coordonates should show up on all linked charts. So, hovering your mouse un a chart, should show the verticat/horizontal lines on all the
MC-1310
Volume Profile integration with Playback
MC-1328
equivolume similar with photontrader, with dynamic bar-width space allocation
MC-1322
playback working with multiple charts of the same symbol

So, please don't forget to vote the features you want to see in next releases.

Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #141 (permalink)
shanemcdonald28
new york
 
 
Posts: 355 since Mar 2012
Thanks: 665 given, 580 received

i have to manually save strategy performance data.
I usually dont get to save it because mc locks up regularly and the data is lost.

why isnt this data saved by the program ?

Standard feature in Ninja trader.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #142 (permalink)
 moonriver 
boulder colorado usa
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: ninjatrader
Trading: fdax
 
Posts: 3 since Nov 2010
Thanks: 0 given, 1 received


Porsche View Post
...However you should reflect how much time, money, or "goodwill credit" you like to spend on beautiful lines.

Well, after all is said and done, and plenty reflecting , I'll stay with the "competition "

Thanks again Porsche

Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Platforms and Indicators MultiCharts > Multicharts with .Net


Last Updated on June 27, 2013


Upcoming Webinars and Events

NinjaTrader Indicator Challenge!

Ongoing

Journal Challenge w/$1,800 in prizes!

May 7

The Cold Hard Truth: Maybe I Am Not Good Enough w/Chris Gray @ Earn2Trade

Elite only
     



Copyright © 2021 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada), info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts