Please elaborate as to why one would not want to trade the most heavily traded futures contract in the world? Is it because it's the most liquid, has virtually zero slippage and no spreads or maybe something like the fact that it respects price levels with damn near to the tick precision while affording one time to assess and get a trade on before it makes its beautiful trend up or down to the next level?
The following 6 users say Thank You to Inletcap for this post:
Totally respect your opinion but would like to point out that:
A 7 point move on a Es contract puts $350 in your pocket whereas a 15 point move on Nq puts $300. It's six of one, half dozen of the other- NQ will have a larger range as its twice the point value.
Risk reward- you lost me there.. You risk dollars to make dollars. Point value makes no difference. Using the above example 7 pts risk on Es is about 15 Nq. Must be using a stop to measure risk rather than expectancy- very dangerous account killing idea. Hard Stops - Why would anybody use these? Catastrophic stops- yes but one should learn to trade rather than rely on training wheels to take their money. Hard stops will kill an account, this is very well known. If using them anyway, there is no difference- point value of stop should be about twice because point value of the index is about twice.
Anyway- not trying to argue, I just don't want some newbie reading this to get misinformation. I have traded both markets and find them to act identical to each other. Now, if you want movement, I suggest trading CL or GC, significantly less volume so she'll give you that immediate reward
I wonder if you quite appreciate how differently from "respect" the tone of your post comes across, Inletcap?
We get that you disagree with Hickock, but referring to his post as "misinformation" seemed pretty unkind to me.
When you also refer to hard stops as "training wheels" and say that they'll kill an account and that "this is very well known", almost as if it's something objective and irrefutable, people could perhaps be forgiven for wondering whose "information" is really in need of correction, here.
From my own experience, I agree with everything Hickock has said, above: I find NQ far easier to trade profitably than ES, myself, for exactly the reasons he mentions.
I don't want it to sound like a complaint or a criticism at all, and it absolutely isn't either, but I've also noticed that there's a fairly strong bias toward ES in this forum (I suspect these things become artificially self-perpetuating, to some extent, simply because ES traders tend gradually to accumulate where the ES discussions are). But there also some NQ traders here, and some of us have opinions, too, which we quite like to be able to express without having them dismissed as "misinformation".
The following 4 users say Thank You to Tymbeline for this post:
Of course everyone should express their opinion as that's what FIO is all about! The tone of my reply was not meant to be demeaning at all, just factual. If I were a newbie trader and stumbled across this post that basically says NQ is easier to trade, has better risk reward and I make more money, I may actually believe that. Truth is every market has its own tendencies that a trader needs to learn to objectify. When one places too much emphasis on a chart, any market is difficult to trade and unfortunately too many books have been written polluting the minds of traders to place hard stops so that they can control thier risk based on chart/bar patterns.
I am not always the best at choosing the right words to get my message across but I would tend to think most believe I am here to help others. I did not mean to offend anyone and appreciated the debate as referenced by thanking the posters comments. I did not receive the same so obviously either my opinion or my delivery did not sit well. Happy trading to all.
The following 4 users say Thank You to Inletcap for this post:
I hear you of course (and by the way I've learned quite a bit from your posts, here, myself), and thank you for such a tactful reply.
It depends what you mean by "believe", I suppose. I believe that NQ is easier for Hickock to trade, has better R:R for him and that he makes more money. I believe all those things of myself, too. That doesn't necessarily mean they'll also be true for a newbie reading such posts, of course. But it also doesn't mean the opposite?
We agree, of course, that every market has its own tendencies that a trader needs to learn to objectify.
Comments about hard stops in books aren't "pollution", from my perspective: learning to use them was among the things that eventually turned me from overall loss into overall profit. Sorry - not what you wanted to hear!
The following 3 users say Thank You to Tymbeline for this post:
"Believe" exactly- I believe that some folks find it better for them but saying "it is absolutely the worst contract for a new trader to trade." is not saying " I find it easier to trade". You have hit the nail on the head!! A lot of guys find value using stops but so many get constantly stopped as they use them to control trade risk vs account risk while trading signal to signal without context- subject for another day in another forum...
Anyway- best of trading to all today
The following 2 users say Thank You to Inletcap for this post:
I encourage folks to trade with context and shoot for the avg daily range vs. scalping signal to signal. This is not a far-fetched idea as you allude and many have embraced the concept with great success. My successes and failures are posted for all to see daily in real time so in no way am I implying guru status. If I were always right, I would have been done trading a long time ago and sipping cocktails on my mega yacht named eMini . As for having time to post, that happens when you are not starring at your screen and grinding out every tick; Speaking of time, this is my last comment as I do not wish to validate your posts any further.
Best of luck to you buddy!
The following 9 users say Thank You to Inletcap for this post: