Mini FDAX - FDXM from Eurex - Emini Index Futures Trading | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Mini FDAX - FDXM from Eurex
Updated: Views / Replies:20,106 / 132
Created: by choke35 Attachments:22

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors – all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you don’t need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 22  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Mini FDAX - FDXM from Eurex

  #1 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Favorite Futures: ES, YM, 6E
 
Posts: 2,466 since Feb 2013
Thanks: 4,342 given, 6,021 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary

Mini FDAX - FDXM from Eurex

Rumors condense that the Eurex will start a Mini FDAX contract.

In the meantime, there are several German sources that cite it, so it might be true.

There are lots of reasons that would militate for FDAX minis:
  • 20-35k € margin for the full-sized FDAX
  • massively shrunken volume during the last 5 years
  • bad liquidity of the full-sized FDAX (e.g. an order of 5 contracts regularly causes slippage and partial fills)
  • setting incentives esp. for private investors to trade (German) futures
  • etc. etc.

At the moment, the following specs are discussed:
  • 5€ per point (instead of 25€ per point for the full-sized FDAX)
  • margin about 1/5 of the full-sized contract
  • tick size 1p (instead of 0.5p for the full-sized contract)

Reply With Quote
The following 19 users say Thank You to choke35 for this post:
 
  #2 (permalink)
Quick Summary
Quick Summary Post

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.

 
  #3 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Favorite Futures: ES, YM, 6E
 
Posts: 2,466 since Feb 2013
Thanks: 4,342 given, 6,021 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


Close to a Eurex statement:

Today, the Boersen-Zeitung, which is the official publication organ of all German securities exchanges,
publishes a short story on page 1. Not much too add to yesterday except one news:
According to the Boersen-Zeitung, the Mini FDAX could already start in October (!).

Link to the story (German):
https://www.boersen-zeitung.de/index.php?li=300&artid=2015187006


Last edited by choke35; September 30th, 2015 at 03:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
The following 9 users say Thank You to choke35 for this post:
 
  #4 (permalink)
Elite Member
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: NTB / Continuum
Favorite Futures: FDAX and CL
 
Balanar's Avatar
 
Posts: 396 since Jan 2013
Thanks: 507 given, 1,625 received

Here is the original statement from EUREX.

Eurex - Eurex expands equity index derivatives segment

Reply With Quote
The following 9 users say Thank You to Balanar for this post:
 
  #5 (permalink)
Elite Member
Sliema/Malta
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT, TS, TT, MC, MATLAB
Broker/Data: MF Global, TT, Zenfire
Favorite Futures: Crude CL, Bund, ZB
 
Posts: 20 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 0 given, 19 received

So what will change and what's the advantage for the trader ? I don't see anything except generating fees for the exchange. Can't support the margin argument. Volume is down on all exchanges/contracts except CL. Slippage will be slightly eased only. If someone used to trade 1 contract, he now trades 5 contracts. If one participant pulled 1 contract the other participant wanted to trade, it will be the same with 5 contracts. The argument to take the CFD/Certificate traders from their market I can't support either. It's just a help for the market makers and algo fuzzies. If you can push the miniFDAX with 1 contract in the FDAX on 0.5 move in and out you lose 12.50 EUR in the FDAX and will win 25EUR in the miniFDAX for these guys. Because they will stay on both sides and the miniFDAX will be the pussy of the FDAX. At least one will always jump on the pushes and fill both sides.


Last edited by gboos; October 1st, 2015 at 04:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #6 (permalink)
Trading for Fun
Rybnik Polska
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Favorite Futures: Futures
 
Posts: 96 since Aug 2015
Thanks: 17 given, 39 received

I'm agree with gboos in most cases.For real players FDax still will be better.For smaller retail investors mini will be no attractive too- CFD on FDax are still much better then this becouse most of CFD privider's got all cost's at only 1 point.So pay more for less ? No - it will probably only take few player's from the big one but it will not add ,,new'' traders.
It will be like new Kospi 200 mini - volume will be at 10 % of Fdax volume (after few months).If they wont to make real change then they should just change tick of actual FDax - but it could be too revolutionary so they dont wont to risk ...

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Tommip for this post:
 
  #7 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Favorite Futures: ES, YM, 6E
 
Posts: 2,466 since Feb 2013
Thanks: 4,342 given, 6,021 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


gboos View Post
So what will change and what's the advantage for the trader ? I don't see anything except generating fees for the exchange. Can't support the margin argument. Volume is down on all exchanges/contracts except CL. Slippage will be slightly eased only. If someone used to trade 1 contract, he now trades 5 contracts. If one participant pulled 1 contract the other participant wanted to trade, it will be the same with 5 contracts. The argument to take the CFD/Certificate traders from their market I can't support either. It's just a help for the market makers and algo fuzzies. If you can push the miniFDAX with 1 contract in the FDAX on 0.5 move in and out you lose 12.50 EUR in the FDAX and will win 25EUR in the miniFDAX for these guys. Because they will stay on both sides and the miniFDAX will be the pussy of the FDAX. At least one will always jump on the pushes and fill both sides.

Sure: Exchanges want to make money. What's wrong with that?
Also sure: There are HFTs out there. If you're a scalper, try to rub noses with them. Good luck.

But: Have you ever compared the intransparency and (hidden) costs of (F)DAX CFDs/Certificates/Warrants
to a DMA trader's FDAX transparency and cost structure? Did you manage to get any quotes at all from the
respective issuers of the non-DMA instruments on days like 8/24? And if so: How far from DMA were they?

If the Eurex doesn't screw it up, I expect similar effects as in the US with the ES and other E-minis.
In the US, the mini asset class changed the entire market dynamics: Liquidity is much higher, spreads
are lower, RM/MM possibilities are better, and transparency is higher than they have ever been with full-sized
contracts (and more transparent than those of CFDs/Certs/Warrants anyway).

That's the real benefit for traders.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to choke35 for this post:
 
  #8 (permalink)
Elite Member
Sliema/Malta
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT, TS, TT, MC, MATLAB
Broker/Data: MF Global, TT, Zenfire
Favorite Futures: Crude CL, Bund, ZB
 
Posts: 20 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 0 given, 19 received

Do not compare the time the Emini S&P's, NQ's etc raised up. This is a totally different story !! At this time there were no CFD's, no certificates, not other now very common leverage products. The 'Big's' died because the floor died. While the 'big's' are dead, the volume in the 'mini's is still decreasing since 2009.

As a typical intra-day certificate trader, why should i move to the miniFDAX ? A lot of these buying cert's close to knockout-barriers with huge leverage, but (!!!) fixed amount of risk without (!!!) slippage on the executed knockout etc. They do not care about 'hidden' costs. Does decreasing tick-size raise volume in equities ? Does decreasing tick-size pretend us from vola ? I guess main intra-day trader like vola.

I heard one argument from the EUREX are the traders who changed from the FDAX to the FESX ... I doubt that. It's just easier to hedge/spread a market with 1/2 ratio instead of 2/5 ratio (like current between FDAX/FESX). So it comes all to the institutional demands only.

Btw, if you don't 'get it' in the FDAX today, you won't get it in the miniFDAX as well. For a scalper it's even more worse then the FDAX. Look at the scalper in the FESX. They are gone. Just gone.

EDIT: syntax only


Last edited by gboos; October 1st, 2015 at 06:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #9 (permalink)
Market Wizard
Germany
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Other
Favorite Futures: ES, YM, 6E
 
Posts: 2,466 since Feb 2013
Thanks: 4,342 given, 6,021 received
Forum Reputation: Legendary


gboos View Post
Do not compare the time the Emini S&P's, NQ's etc raised up. This is a totally different story !! At this time there were no CFD's, no certificates, not other now very common leverage products. The 'Big's' died because the floor died. While the 'big's' are dead, the volume in the 'mini's is still decreasing since 2009.

As a typical intra-day certificate trader, why should i move to the miniFDAX ? A lot of these buying cert's close to knockout-barriers with huge leverage, but (!!!) fixed amount of risk without (!!!) slippage on the executed knockout etc. They do not care about 'hidden' costs. Does decreasing tick-size raise volume in equities ? Does decreasing tick-size pretend us from vola ? I guess main intra-day trader like vola.

I heard one argument from the EUREX are the traders who changed from the FDAX to the FESX ... I doubt that. It's just easier to hedge/spread a market with 1/2 ratio instead of 2/5 ration (like current between FDAX/FESX). So it come all to the institutional demands.

Btw, if you don't 'get it' in the FDAX today, you won't get it in the eminiFDAX as well. For a scalper it's even more worse then the FDAX. Look at the scalper in the FESX. They are gone. Just gone.

I'd never try to convince the non-DMA/CFDs/Certs/Warrants buy side

Over the years I've traded my way up to futures.
My personal summary is: non-DMA assets are fine for learning with small change (plus for some special situations,
e.g. mitigating RM/MM effects when margins of DMA assets go up by 50% for several days like in August). And exactly
such is the non-DMA order and customer structure that is reported by the issuers - penny-ante stuff. Order sizes and half-life
periods show, that 90% of non-DMA asset traders wouldn't be off worse buying a lottery ticket in the morning.
Fixed amount of risk, end foreseeable.

For the rest, it's good for learning - not for earning, since costs of non-DMA assets are multiples of those of DMA markets -
esp for frequent traders and regardless of whether you pay it cut into pieces or mostly upfront (or how do you think the issuers
of knock-out products make their money ).

As soon as your trading is stable - i.e. at least break-even plus some - and you can afford an adequate RM/MM,
I'd suggest to switch to DMA markets and assets. And among these I don't know of any asset class that
is more liquid, more efficient, and more transparent than futures.

P.S.: In that sense I give a warm welcome to a mini FDAX that (potentially) extends these competitive advantages.


Last edited by choke35; October 1st, 2015 at 07:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to choke35 for this post:
 
  #10 (permalink)
Elite Member
Sliema/Malta
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT, TS, TT, MC, MATLAB
Broker/Data: MF Global, TT, Zenfire
Favorite Futures: Crude CL, Bund, ZB
 
Posts: 20 since Jun 2009
Thanks: 0 given, 19 received


Your personal preference doesn't count. There is no serious argument current CFD's/Certificate traders should move to the miniFDAX. For overnight traders, I see even less arguments, because the margin doesn't count and it's a huge disadvantage to the CFD's/Certificates with a risk-overload on the 'futures' side ...

Commission wise where do you want to see a miniFDAX compared to the (at least) 2.00EUR round-turn on the FDAX one on one ? What amount would be attractive for you to move from FDAX to miniFDAX ? Please specifiy ....

Please specify your theoretical Bid/Ask-Risk of the miniFDAX compared to the FDAX and come to a conclusion who will get ..... in the miniFDAX.

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > Mini FDAX - FDXM from Eurex

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

July Journal Challenge w/$1100 in prizes from TopstepTrader

July
 

An Afternoon with FIO member Softsoap

Elite only

Battlestations: Show us your trading desks and win $750 in prizes

August
 

Extended Ask Me Anything w/Brett Steenbarger

Elite only

Prototyping Python Strategies (part 3) w/Ran Aroussi

Elite only

Brannigan Barrett w/Axia Futures

Elite only

Introduction to Phillip Capital futures brokerage services

Aug TBD

How Monte Carlo Analysis Can Help Your Trading w/Kevin Davey

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's happening at Eurex? [Edit: Eurex is trading again] Jura Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 13 February 23rd, 2016 02:53 PM
Eurex is now available on Rithmic @ AMP Bogan Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 6 January 24th, 2014 07:37 PM
NinjaTrader Broker that does Mini Lots for FDAX synergy Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 13 December 4th, 2012 06:45 PM
FDAX (Eurex) Broker for Ninjatrader ikeaboy Reviews of Brokers and Data Feeds 5 August 17th, 2011 09:21 PM
What's the ticker for FDAX on the EUREX? ptd26 Beginners and Introductions 6 February 8th, 2010 02:09 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-07-25 in 0.13 seconds with 20 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.92.128.223