Looking at how thin the book is compared to years ago, around ~100 limits per tick, who is placing this limits?
I mean, most are market makers, but how many? Does a market making firm place 1 order per tick? 10?
Most days feels like the E-minis are being traded by a few market makers and a few thousands retail traders, the days institutions are trading it are very easy to distinguish and do not happen very often.
Why got the book so thin? I've seen screenshots from 2017 with ~1k limit orders per tick, has the e-mini reached a point of efficiency where is not worth trading anymore?
The following user says Thank You to anubis for this post:
I’ve read elsewhere in this forum people asking the same question and some commenting on how they think a lot of large firms went under when the market crashed at the start of the pandemic and that is a big reason the liquidity is not like it used to be. I personally think some of it also went to micros but not much. Who knows really.
The following 2 users say Thank You to awesomizer for this post:
Considering the volume on /es is almost the same as 9 years ago, I think it has something to do with the fact that 1% move in 2012 was ~12 points and now its ~40 points. But honestly I have no idea just the first thing that popped into my head.
The following 5 users say Thank You to wowleva for this post:
The higher the ES gets the thinner the liquidity will end up being. Indexes will still tend to move in percentage moves. So the higher the ES gets, the more ticks it will trade per day on average. Which means the liquidity gets spread out more.
Micros are going to suck the minis dry in the next 5 years, look at MNQ almost 3 times NQ, MES about 400k behind ES and M2k about 10k above RTY at the moment. Micros are going to continue to grow. I trade more Micros then minis now, commission sucks a bit but my w/l has gone up about 15%.
off topic my bad,
-P
"Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie"-Miyamoto Musashi
The following 2 users say Thank You to MiniP for this post:
That's definitely true... I was studying liquidity some weeks ago and I couldn't believe my eyes, MNQ is more liquid than NQ!! that's crazy.
Another factor that dries up liquidity are ETFs, a lot of money has moved from futures to ETF and this creates problems.
Many traders can trade SPY instead of ES, or NQQ instead of /NQ.
Finally what about TopStep, Oneup and all the rest of the funding firms? I think they are also eating the liquidity, many people starting out in trading prefer to start with one of those companies and until they reach the funded phase their orders do not go to the markets.
