Correlation - Emini and Emicro Index Futures Trading | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


Correlation
Updated: Views / Replies:793 / 8
Created: by otiose Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 100,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

Correlation

  #1 (permalink)
Malaysia
 
Trading Experience: None
Platform: Tradestation, Trading BLox
Favorite Futures: Future
 
Posts: 6 since Mar 2014
Thanks: 0 given, 5 received

Correlation

anyone got any good correlation videos / link to share

Reply With Quote
 
  #2 (permalink)
Quick Summary
Quick Summary Post

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.

 
  #3 (permalink)
Market Wizard
North Carolina
 
Trading Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader, Tradestation
Favorite Futures: es
 
Posts: 659 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 285 given, 815 received


Correlation simply means "to move together". Pearson's correlation or simply correlation assumes linearity. I'm not really sure on the value of correlation. But, traders have cited some ways they have used correlation:

1. Correlation can be used for confirmation. For example, if two markets are correlated and they both go up or down then one might view it as a real move whereas if only one goes up then one might view the one that goes up as an opportunity to short. This is often used when thinking of spread trading or spread ideas. The problem is markets are arbitraged heavily.

2. Sometimes correlation is used to identify potentially predictive variables. For example, if I have a variable Z that is correlated with price then if I can predict Z then I can predict price. Of course, it assumes Z is easier to predict then price.

3. If we allow ourselves to look at correlation of lead or lags in time then it looks like prediction. X lag 1 correlated with a rise in price is stating X is predictive.

4. Correlation is often used in spread trading. If the two instruments are correlated and if the spread is wide: the idea is to buy the under-priced and sell the over priced. However, correlations in markets can break down.

5. There is surely some important relationship between linear regression and correlation.

https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/2125/whats-the-difference-between-correlation-and-simple-linear-regression

Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to tpredictor for this post:
 
  #4 (permalink)
Houston, TX
 
Trading Experience: Beginner
Platform: TOS; TradeStation
Favorite Futures: ES; CL; NQ
 
Posts: 14 since Jan 2018
Thanks: 10 given, 5 received


tpredictor View Post
Correlation simply means "to move together". Pearson's correlation or simply correlation assumes linearity. I'm not really sure on the value of correlation. But, traders have cited some ways they have used correlation:

1. Correlation can be used for confirmation. For example, if two markets are correlated and they both go up or down then one might view it as a real move whereas if only one goes up then one might view the one that goes up as an opportunity to short. This is often used when thinking of spread trading or spread ideas. The problem is markets are arbitraged heavily.

2. Sometimes correlation is used to identify potentially predictive variables. For example, if I have a variable Z that is correlated with price then if I can predict Z then I can predict price. Of course, it assumes Z is easier to predict then price.

3. If we allow ourselves to look at correlation of lead or lags in time then it looks like prediction. X lag 1 correlated with a rise in price is stating X is predictive.

4. Correlation is often used in spread trading. If the two instruments are correlated and if the spread is wide: the idea is to buy the under-priced and sell the over priced. However, correlations in markets can break down.

5. There is surely some important relationship between linear regression and correlation.

https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/2125/whats-the-difference-between-correlation-and-simple-linear-regression

So if i'm using a correlation study to compare the ES and the NQ as a means to use the market internals that are geared to the NQ, would that be a false derivation? Should i include another brand of market internals coupled with this correlation study?

Reply With Quote
 
  #5 (permalink)
Market Wizard
North Carolina
 
Trading Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader, Tradestation
Favorite Futures: es
 
Posts: 659 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 285 given, 815 received

@sholcombe4 Sorry I am not sure whether or not I understand your question. Remember, correlation just measures the tendency of two things to move together. If you want to use some data in your trading, using correlation as a means to test if it makes sense to use the data would make sense.

As for ES/NQ, if you wanted to spread trade these you would want to look at the correlation and cointegration to see how they are related. A widening spread indicates sentiment that the market anticipates one market to outperform/under-perform the other. Statistically, if the markets are highly correlated (really co-integrated) it might also suggest an arbitrage opportunity with a high probability of the spread narrowing.

If you are using the "confirmation" thesis/example then yes you would want to know if the time series are correlated, this tells you if it make sense to use the data.

Right regarding market internals, you might want to measure whether or not the market internals are correlated with price change before using them. However, whether or not it makes sense to use NQ market internals for ES market: we know the correlations will be less using NQ internals for ES data right off the bat. So, the rational thesis must be the ES internals will be better for ES market vs using the NQ internals for ES market. Why? Because the internals measure the subcontinents of the index. However, and this is where things get complex -- if you have a complex non-linear model then you might derive some value even from weakly correlated data. As well, even very low R^2 scores on data can still be used to build profitable trading systems.

I mean think about it this way, it is highly likely that volume on NQ and volume on ES are highly correlated. However, if you want to know the volume for the given instrument, it is available, we know that the volume for ES will move with volume for ES 100% of the time. So, we know that even if the NQ volume is correlated, it will never be as useful as ES volume (if volume is even useful) with the caveat/exception if we are somehow able to combine them.

Now, let me give an example where it can make sense to use correlation. Let's take an instrument like BTCUSD (but also applies to stocks) that trade on many exchanges. There are internal/intrinsic factors that will affect market maker pricing and external/extrinsic factors. Intrinsic factors might be a market makers risk exposure, probability or tendency to try gaming (competition), and net exposure.

Let's imagine the GDAX market maker has too much net long exposure and thus pull some resting limit buy orders from the book. This makes it easy for a low volume of selling to dip the price. If we know that the dip in price is only because of intrinsic factor concerning the market maker (and/or the participant) then we can anticipate it is more likely to be a good dip to buy versus if there was a trend developing or if all exchanges were dipping in price.

In this case, we'd like to use correlation to know if the move is real. In order to understand this, it helps to imagine/understand the use case of the alternative. Imagine if some sort of negative news comes out, maybe something about new regulations. We might imagine that participants will sell on all the exchanges. In this case, we anticipate to see the price dip (move together) on all the exchanges. This change in price is more likely to represent the consensus of the market participants and not to be a good dip to buy for an immediate profit.


Last edited by tpredictor; January 6th, 2018 at 03:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to tpredictor for this post:
 
  #6 (permalink)
London
 
Trading Experience: None
Platform: .
Favorite Futures: .
 
Posts: 255 since Apr 2011
Thanks: 65 given, 178 received

MRCI's Inter-Market Correlations

Reply With Quote
 
  #7 (permalink)
Houston, TX
 
Trading Experience: Beginner
Platform: TOS; TradeStation
Favorite Futures: ES; CL; NQ
 
Posts: 14 since Jan 2018
Thanks: 10 given, 5 received


tpredictor View Post
@sholcombe4 Sorry I am not sure whether or not I understand your question. Remember, correlation just measures the tendency of two things to move together. If you want to use some data in your trading, using correlation as a means to test if it makes sense to use the data would make sense.

As for ES/NQ, if you wanted to spread trade these you would want to look at the correlation and cointegration to see how they are related. A widening spread indicates sentiment that the market anticipates one market to outperform/under-perform the other. Statistically, if the markets are highly correlated (really co-integrated) it might also suggest an arbitrage opportunity with a high probability of the spread narrowing.

If you are using the "confirmation" thesis/example then yes you would want to know if the time series are correlated, this tells you if it make sense to use the data.

Right regarding market internals, you might want to measure whether or not the market internals are correlated with price change before using them. However, whether or not it makes sense to use NQ market internals for ES market: we know the correlations will be less using NQ internals for ES data right off the bat. So, the rational thesis must be the ES internals will be better for ES market vs using the NQ internals for ES market. Why? Because the internals measure the subcontinents of the index. However, and this is where things get complex -- if you have a complex non-linear model then you might derive some value even from weakly correlated data. As well, even very low R^2 scores on data can still be used to build profitable trading systems.

I mean think about it this way, it is highly likely that volume on NQ and volume on ES are highly correlated. However, if you want to know the volume for the given instrument, it is available, we know that the volume for ES will move with volume for ES 100% of the time. So, we know that even if the NQ volume is correlated, it will never be as useful as ES volume (if volume is even useful) with the caveat/exception if we are somehow able to combine them.

Now, let me give an example where it can make sense to use correlation. Let's take an instrument like BTCUSD (but also applies to stocks) that trade on many exchanges. There are internal/intrinsic factors that will affect market maker pricing and external/extrinsic factors. Intrinsic factors might be a market makers risk exposure, probability or tendency to try gaming (competition), and net exposure.

Let's imagine the GDAX market maker has too much net long exposure and thus pull some resting limit buy orders from the book. This makes it easy for a low volume of selling to dip the price. If we know that the dip in price is only because of intrinsic factor concerning the market maker (and/or the participant) then we can anticipate it is more likely to be a good dip to buy versus if there was a trend developing or if all exchanges were dipping in price.

In this case, we'd like to use correlation to know if the move is real. In order to understand this, it helps to imagine/understand the use case of the alternative. Imagine if some sort of negative news comes out, maybe something about new regulations. We might imagine that participants will sell on all the exchanges. In this case, we anticipate to see the price dip (move together) on all the exchanges. This change in price is more likely to represent the consensus of the market participants and not to be a good dip to buy for an immediate profit.



Brilliant! Thanks a ton for your help in this matter! Makes a lot of sense!


Sent using the futures.io mobile app

Reply With Quote
 
  #8 (permalink)
Bari, Italy
 
Trading Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Favorite Futures: Emini ES
 
Posts: 38 since May 2018
Thanks: 70 given, 9 received


tpredictor View Post
@sholcombe4



Let's imagine the GDAX market maker has too much net long exposure and thus pull some resting limit buy orders from the book. This makes it easy for a low volume of selling to dip the price. If we know that the dip in price is only because of intrinsic factor concerning the market maker (and/or the participant) then we can anticipate it is more likely to be a good dip to buy versus if there was a trend developing or if all exchanges were dipping in price.

In this case, we'd like to use correlation to know if the move is real.

https://futures.io/traders-hideout/45604-webinar-improve-your-trading-market-correlations-w-jigsaw-cannon-trading.html
A similar concept is explained in the webinar above

Reply With Quote
 
  #9 (permalink)
sweden
 
Trading Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader,MetaTrader
Favorite Futures: futures, FX
 
Mabi's Avatar
 
Posts: 104 since Oct 2010
Thanks: 98 given, 92 received

Correlation in autotrading can be used to increase stability of a portfolio containing intraday strategies even on the same instrument depending on the period choosen for which they are studied it can be based on hourly , daily,weekly or monthly profit/loss in trades taken. I just use correlation of loss on monthly basis. If one strategy is loosing i want the other one to be winning. When both are winning it is great but i do not want them to be loosing at the same time if possible.

Reply With Quote

Reply



futures io > > > > Correlation




Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)
 

futures io is celebrating 10-years w/ over $18,000 in prizes!

Right now
 

Thanks for everything -- $250 in Amazon Gift Cards ready to give away

Right now
 

Journal in July -- over $2,500 in prizes w/NinjaTrader

July
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ETF Correlation Big Mike Stocks and ETFs Trading 6 January 3rd, 2017 03:13 PM
correlation larrywwc Emini and Emicro Index Futures Trading 2 September 21st, 2015 01:38 PM
Correlation is not causality Nicolas11 Traders Hideout 2 February 4th, 2015 01:27 AM
Correlation indicator chadschneid NinjaTrader 0 August 15th, 2014 10:25 AM
Correlation Function NJAMC The Elite Circle 11 March 11th, 2014 08:56 PM


Tags
ai, arbitrage, ats, autotrading, buy, combine, correlation, data, dow, e micro, e mini, e-micro, e-mini, emicro, emini, futures, index futures, index_futures, information, instrument, intraday, jigsaw, limit, loss, news, nq, orders, portfolio, profitable, regression, sentiment, short, spread, spread trading, stocks, strategies, strategy, systems, tapatalk, time series, trading, trading systems, trend, volume, webinar

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM. (this page content is cached, log in for real-time version)

Copyright © 2019 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432 WhatsApp Business, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts