NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Is this strategy good enough?


Discussion in Currencies

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one baruchs with 34 posts (1 thanks)
    2. looks_two monpere with 17 posts (6 thanks)
    3. looks_3 ThatManFromTexas with 15 posts (15 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Trader.Jon with 12 posts (1 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one LukeGeniol with 1.5 thanks per post
    2. looks_two ThatManFromTexas with 1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 MWinfrey with 0.6 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 monpere with 0.4 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 34,181 views
    2. thumb_up 62 thanks given
    3. group 14 followers
    1. forum 145 posts
    2. attach_file 6 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Is this strategy good enough?

  #11 (permalink)
 
MWinfrey's Avatar
 MWinfrey 
Lubbock TX
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Stage 5 Trading
Trading: CL
Posts: 1,878 since Jul 2009
Thanks Given: 1,450
Thanks Received: 3,335


baruchs View Post
O.K.
I see that at least some people try to think about it, so lets continue.
I didn't say that the strategy is an automated one, but to answer my question, I wouldn't trade it if it wasn't.
The robustness I talked about consist in that this strategy performs the same for about 20 instruments.
Now my question is what do you think will be the net profit and DD if traded on 20 instruments together?

Baruch
p.s.
After I gather some answers I'll post backtest results. They will blow your mind.

I hope your backtesting is accurate. EVERY time I got results that blew my mind I found a mistake. Just a note that has nothing to do with your questions...i use backtesting to validate my rules, to make sure I'm not overlooking something. I don't expect results until I forward test and the forward testing results match the backtesting results. Believe it or not, the 2 can be really really close. Not exact but really close.

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
Quant vue
Trading Reviews and Vendors
About a successful futures trader who didn´t know anyth …
Psychology and Money Management
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
Cheap historycal L1 data for stocks
Stocks and ETFs
 
  #12 (permalink)
 
ThatManFromTexas's Avatar
 ThatManFromTexas 
Houston,Tx
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Trading: TF
Posts: 2,265 since Feb 2010
Thanks Given: 1,206
Thanks Received: 4,355


baruchs View Post
Hi,
Strategy that gives annual netprofit of 5K and max. DD of 1.8K. Is it good enough to trade?
One more thing - this is very robust strategy. I don't want to explain yet what it means.

Baruch
p.s. Lets assume that those numbers include commissions and slippage.

Aww, Hell Yea!

Don't listen to the pessimistic naysayers of this thread . They are just like ... wayyy tooo hung up on facts.

If you have a system that is guaranteed to make $1 per contract per year after slippage and fees, Trade it... just crank up the number of contracts to like 200,000 to begin with and then ratchet it up as you build up your account. The Sky is the limit!


MetalTrade View Post
Backtesting is one of the biggest myths in our business. I never believed in it.

Forward testing is the only way to go.

Yea, and I bet you tell children there is no Santa Clause/Kris Kringle (whatever), either...

@MetalTrade.. as much as I hate to admit it... I agree with you wholeheartedly...

Disclaimer: This post does not represent the view point the owners, managers, or moderators of this web site and is not intended as a slam against any moderator, board member, any banned former members whose name we dare not say, any other living person, any recently living person or any person or persons whose status we are not sure of. This post is meant purely for entertainment and should not be confused with a real thought.

I'm just a simple man trading a simple plan.

My daddy always said, "Every day above ground is a good day!"
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)
 
Trader.Jon's Avatar
 Trader.Jon 
Near the BEuTiFULL Horse Shoe
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: MBTrading Dukascopy ZenFire
Trading: $EURUSD when it is trending
Posts: 473 since Jul 2009
Thanks Given: 401
Thanks Received: 184



baruchs View Post
Hi,
Strategy that gives annual netprofit of 5K and max. DD of 1.8K. Is it good enough to trade?
One more thing - this is very robust strategy. I don't want to explain yet what it means.

Baruch
p.s. Lets assume that those numbers include commissions and slippage.

HHmmm .. not enough information for me ... this is what I am trying to decide on: is it goodenuf?

the strategy is coded LONG ONLY, parameters unchanged after 2.25.2010. Including test period in early 2010 the net profit (gains - loss) is 53364 US on $EURUSD with 8667 trades (2889 entries with 2 PTs and 1 runner that also has a profit target) on euro10000 minilots ... on this backtesting commision = $6760 and slippage == ???? [how do you calculate that?] drawdown max = $183 as per NT

Sharpe 2.45 ProfitFactor 2.52 Ratio W:L 1.00 72% winners and $6.16/trade average
No losing weeks in 2011 .. only 1 losing week in 2010 (again, in backtesting using replay data from NT servers)

The SHORT strategy is actually a bit better for 2010 but I am not posting that at the moment to keep it simple. That strategy is basically same structure but differing parameters and different time span for initial testing. Backtesting was on replay data from the NT servers, and the screen shots are from Dukascopy on todays trades

Right screen is SIMtrade on Dukascopy and the left screen is the backtesting on that data ... obviously I have a coding problem ... entry is above the close of the trigger bar which is normally (almost 100% of the time) a bearish bar!

ANY and ALL Feedback is appreciated,
TJ

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Vitek.LONG.V07F.2011.02.08..jpg
Views:	334
Size:	924.7 KB
ID:	30373  
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)
 
sam028's Avatar
 sam028 
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 3,765 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 3,825
Thanks Received: 4,629


Trader.Jon View Post
HHmmm .. not enough information for me ... this is what I am trying to decide on: is it goodenuf?

the strategy is coded LONG ONLY, parameters unchanged after 2.25.2010. Including test period in early 2010 the net profit (gains - loss) is 53364 US on $EURUSD with 8667 trades (2889 entries with 2 PTs and 1 runner that also has a profit target) on euro10000 minilots ... on this backtesting commision = $6760 and slippage == ???? [how do you calculate that?] drawdown max = $183 as per NT

Sharpe 2.45 ProfitFactor 2.52 Ratio W:L 1.00 72% winners and $6.16/trade average
No losing weeks in 2011 .. only 1 losing week in 2010 (again, in backtesting using replay data from NT servers)

The SHORT strategy is actually a bit better for 2010 but I am not posting that at the moment to keep it simple. That strategy is basically same structure but differing parameters and different time span for initial testing. Backtesting was on replay data from the NT servers, and the screen shots are from Dukascopy on todays trades

Right screen is SIMtrade on Dukascopy and the left screen is the backtesting on that data ... obviously I have a coding problem ... entry is above the close of the trigger bar which is normally (almost 100% of the time) a bearish bar!

ANY and ALL Feedback is appreciated,
TJ

You should try the same "test" with range or minute bars, and not Renko.
Just to be sure that the problem is not coming from the Renko's...

Success requires no deodorant! (Sun Tzu)
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)
 
Trader.Jon's Avatar
 Trader.Jon 
Near the BEuTiFULL Horse Shoe
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: MBTrading Dukascopy ZenFire
Trading: $EURUSD when it is trending
Posts: 473 since Jul 2009
Thanks Given: 401
Thanks Received: 184


sam028 View Post
You should try the same "test" with range or minute bars, and not Renko.
Just to be sure that the problem is not coming from the Renko's...

sam,

Thanks for the feedback. I want to be sure I understand what you mean.

So, to help me out, specifically: I should retest & re-optimize with other bar types to see if the trade entry is handled differently on SIM? IF to retest, I use a MTF strategy, and the other time frames are 4 range and 3 BetterRenko ... leave them alone or change them to range or seconds as well ... I note you didnt mention tick bars ??!!

I had done some of the original backtesting on range bars and then applied the same parameters to the BetterRenko which gave better results. I have also seen the famous 'stairstep' phantom range bars in NT (when there is no actual trades at those values): very annoying to indicators.

mmm ... I was thinking that the EnterLong() I have in the code might be lacking in that it looks like I am getting a market fill and I should use something like EnterLongLimit() to set the specific price (ie close of the trigger bar or better) for entry BUT in backtesting it (EnterLong() ) always takes the open value of the next bar. I did run across your comments in this thread (which I will be aware of as I rework the code!):

Jon

Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)
 baruchs 
Israel
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: pfg
Trading: eminis
Posts: 323 since Jun 2009

Well I see that this thread initiated some discussion, but unfortunately not the kind that I intended.
You don't know the point of this thread and what I mean with my remark "blow your mind".
I don't want to brag about some strategy that I wrote. The strategy results that I intended to show are from inaccurate backtesting and I know that, but it is not important for the point I was trying to make.
They are inaccurate because they were done on FOREX without considering the spread. Again I know that and again it should not matter for my point.
Please don't try to teach me about backtesting, forward testing and live trading with real account. Believe me I know the differences.
I encourage real mind storming and I would be grateful to anyone who can teach me something new on trading.
In 1.5 years on this and 3 years in other forums no one did it yet, but I'm optimistic.
All my trading philosophy I made myself.
Well if no one wants to answer my question then you can continue babbling I'm done.

p.s. The real discution should have started after I make my point.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)
 
LukeGeniol's Avatar
 LukeGeniol 
Italy (IT) Italy
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: ATAS, R|Trader, NT8
Broker: Rithmic
Trading: CL, Brent, GC, TF
Frequency: Daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 1,499 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 408
Thanks Received: 985

$1.8 k DD for every of 20 instruments? It seems quite high, it can mine your account, if not enough big.

Take your Pips, go out and Live.
Luke.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)
 baruchs 
Israel
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: pfg
Trading: eminis
Posts: 323 since Jun 2009


Quoting 
$1.8 k DD for every of 20 instruments? It seems quite high, it can mine your account, if not enough big.

Its an average, so on some instruments its bigger and on some its smaller.
Still you didn't answered the question. Please try and not invent new questions.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)
 MetalTrade 
 
Posts: 1,055 since May 2010


baruchs View Post
Well I see that this thread initiated some discussion, but unfortunately not the kind that I intended.
You don't know the point of this thread and what I mean with my remark "blow your mind".
I don't want to brag about some strategy that I wrote. The strategy results that I intended to show are from inaccurate backtesting and I know that, but it is not important for the point I was trying to make.
They are inaccurate because they were done on FOREX without considering the spread. Again I know that and again it should not matter for my point.
Please don't try to teach me about backtesting, forward testing and live trading with real account. Believe me I know the differences.
I encourage real mind storming and I would be grateful to anyone who can teach me something new on trading.
In 1.5 years on this and 3 years in other forums no one did it yet, but I'm optimistic.
All my trading philosophy I made myself.
Well if no one wants to answer my question then you can continue babbling I'm done.

p.s. The real discution should have started after I make my point.

Hello, sorry we didn't supply you with the answers you were looking for.

At least half of what I know about trading comes from Bigmike. If you know more than what's to be found on bigmike, well kudos to you.

Oh it's forex ? You forgot 1 thing : the stop hunting all those forex brokers do. I traded forex. I always had a really nasty feeling they hunted my stops. Not kidding you. I moved to futures and I don't have this feeling anymore ?

Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)
 
redratsal's Avatar
 redratsal 
Milan (I)
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Ninjatrader
Broker: Kinetick
Trading: FDAX,6E,CL,YM,NQ,ES
Posts: 1,648 since Oct 2010
Thanks Given: 1,215
Thanks Received: 2,090



baruchs View Post
Well I see that this thread initiated some discussion, but unfortunately not the kind that I intended.
You don't know the point of this thread and what I mean with my remark "blow your mind".
I don't want to brag about some strategy that I wrote. The strategy results that I intended to show are from inaccurate backtesting and I know that, but it is not important for the point I was trying to make.
They are inaccurate because they were done on FOREX without considering the spread. Again I know that and again it should not matter for my point.
Please don't try to teach me about backtesting, forward testing and live trading with real account. Believe me I know the differences.
I encourage real mind storming and I would be grateful to anyone who can teach me something new on trading.
In 1.5 years on this and 3 years in other forums no one did it yet, but I'm optimistic.
All my trading philosophy I made myself.
Well if no one wants to answer my question then you can continue babbling I'm done.

p.s. The real discution should have started after I make my point.

Wrong or right it is better to say something than nothing, I think you should consider everybody's point of view and reply with yours. With regards to some remarks this forum is multiethnical and with more or less touchy people, sometimes it is difficult to understand the meaning behind words. I am not a moderator but I was interested, as anobody who posted in your thread, therefore I would like you explain your points and open issues.

Thx

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote




Last Updated on March 7, 2011


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts