This shows that the 6E contract is oversized, if you compare them to the other contracts, which come all very close to a nominal value of 100,000 $.
As you may expect this has historical reasons. The Euro has gradually been gaining strength against the US dollar over the last decade, which has increased its value. The Aussie has gained even more, but probably the contract size to start with was smaller than today.
Please register on futures.io to view futures trading content such as post attachment(s), image(s), and screenshot(s).
The following 5 users say Thank You to Fat Tails for this post:
When these contracts are established, I suspect that they are based on what made sense at the time based on value, fluctuations, and socio/economics. Further, since these are deliverable contacts, they (exchange) had to accept what is a reasonable deliverable amount.
The notional value has been fluctuating on the currencies relative to the US has been fluctuating for a while but I dont think that after so many years there will be any change to the contract size.
The Swaps/Forwards contracts today is much bigger than the stand contacts because you can customer amounts and delivery so "standardization" is not always a solution to all.
As a side note: The first currency futures were established in NY. But, because of the fixed exchange at the time nothing really happened. When Brenton Woods was abolished (72?-I think) the currency futures took off.
Chicago again takes the cake LOL
PM with any questions about optimusfutures (800) 771-6748 (561) 367 8686. THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF LOSS IN FUTURES TRADING.
The following user says Thank You to mattz for this post: