Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Hey LittleKnown, I'm doing good and yes I did know about the signal bender/blender(?) thread.
I just finished going through a 2004 yahoo group with 1400 postings (each on its own page ugh) from a guy that was maybe JetTrader's friend (dont know) but he basically took JetTrader's very first base system and built around that a little and helped a few people there in 04. However even in 04 what he had was not nearly as far as JetTrader had it at that time. But even then this guy was able to teach people being complete noobs to having something like 75% success rate. Using just numbers and hardly charts. He never showed the way he got the calculations that these people were then using but it seemed like TCDs and some other things. Now just to try and get similar values myself from anything JetTrader has explained and I can then see instantly how they were trading it in the early days.
It is important to note that his early system was not predictive. It just used some ground calculations and they traded from that. Now like JetTrader has said he uses metadata and stuff he has gained from raw data research for finding patterns. And it predicts the future a little ahead of time - or a lot I don't know.
Anyway I really like his approach, never knew how to use multiple time frames and see how they impact each other. So I'm going to read over what I have saved from these few years of posts and do my own research from there. I think he posts some very good information in 2009 on dailyfx boards and in 2010 on trade2win forum. Just something I found and scanned over today. Just didn't read it all since I just read 1400 seperate pages of a 04 yahoo group and I'm taking a break from that.
Just nice to know the history of the system instead of only hearing the most technical things from the newest posts I guess. Though really I would skip that 04 stuff. I think he tries to explain his stuff the best he can public in 09 and 2010.
--
Edit: Hey JetTrader. I didn't mean to hijack your thread in any way. Honestly it's just that most people are thinking were they'll get tomorrow's money so they won't be willing to take their time and discuss what sounds to them like a hit and miss type research (referring to harmonics) :/ Plus that this forum is very small. I hope you are still here though.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
So my initial suspiscion of JetTrader's identity was correct...he has been producing these kinds of threads for years on nearly every English speaking trading forum out there...hundreds if not more than a thousand posts combined under various user names giving monologues in pseudoscientific language about "blades", "falcons", "stealths", "TCD's" and what not.
Oh, btw. "defence" is indeed a correct spelling. Welcome to British English...you know what I'm talking about,lol.
My initial thought, after reading 2-3 posts by JetTrader, was that I know this person from other trading forums. I wasn't 100% sure though, now "feelnot" confirmed my assumption in his post above.
You can indeed do a search on trade2win and search for posts from "tradernumber7" and "stealththrader".
Don't be dissapointed though, that after reading 100 posts and more by the above user, you will most likely find next to zero substance.
I therefore wonder what drives Jettrader to make these lenghthy posts that say so little on so many forums.
OK, I see now. If you have a problem with a post, use the report post feature. Do not use the forums to air your problems or comments about another user. If you have a problem with a user, use the ignore user feature.
Off topic for a sec, suppose it is each to their own as I think there is something of substance from a few of the posts, but what do I know I'm a newb and decided to do a degree instead of trying to understand something like finance and markets which I am mathematically unable to at the minute, and trying to learn from trading forums is like with klitschko's both at once . I like the idea of what was given as in creating own indicators from OHLC deltas of different bars of data, also there wouldn't have been as much to go through if people hadn't trashed his threads. 95% of traders supposedly lose so out the box thinking is surely not such a bad thing and his ideas are certainly out of what I would call the box! Anyway this is on harmonics and I am nowhere near being able to give this thread any substance so, later!
PS zt379 I tried pm'ing you but I can't at min and can't post links either so just google signal bender (don't know where anyone got the blender part from) and it should come up in results
One of the biggest reasons why I don't waste my time anymore on trading forums, is precisely this kind of clueless post. If you don't understand something, how does that translate to others who do? If you don't get something, how does that affect others who do?
For some odd reason, its always been other traders from England/U.K. (to be flat out honest) that have been by far the most assumptive and the most dogmatic in their declaration that they are being sold something. Yet, in the more than 10 years that I've been developing, trading and sharing in the online community, not a single person can find or locate a single sales pitch, sales transaction, or produce a single receipt of payment, proving that they've been sold something.
In fact, to the contrary - if I were so arrogant as these same people, then I would proclaim that others owe me something in return. I've got one person who sold his restaurant to trade full time - based on some of my early work that he developed further into his own system. I've got another person who went on to develop in concert with another individual, a website where he recycles indicators after tweaking them and shares with others a trading method that is directly based on a single Indicator that I shared many years ago. I've got several other individuals who are experiencing success in their trading businesses, all based on some of my most early work that they took, expanded and made their own. These people don't post online anymore - and that's the MO of most successful traders. They simply don't spend the time they used to online anymore, because they've got what they need to be successful.
I return to the online community from time-to-time because I remember what it was like not being successful and I know how hard it is get successful in this business. So, I post online to spark the imagination of the new trader, looking for insight - not to hand anyone anything on a silver platter. Quite frankly, it is impossible for me to explain the technical details behind my full trading system at this point - its too darn complex. It is not a trading method - it is a fully integrated trading system with many components that have been engineered and designed to work in concert with each other.
I don't drive your father's Chevrolet. It is more like a Star ship. In fact, when I am done fully integrating Harmonics into the current system, its name will change from JetTrader v3.0, to Enterprise Trader v1.0. And, yes - when that system name change is made, I will also change my online User I.D.
That's how it has worked for more than 10 years now. I use the User I.D. of my system name, to represent the evolution of the original design.
All proprietary, private, never for sale and exclusively used by me. If along the way, you can glean something from what I post, fine with me. If not, that's still fine with me.
If you can't find something for sale in more than 10 years, then I question why you keep making posts that insinuate as much.
I don't post for the arrogant and the assumptive. I post for the inspiration of those who dare to believe that they can become successful traders, too. Often times, what one needs is not a hand delivered algorithm, but an idea that opens the door to creative thought and creating problem solving.
That's all trading is about - problem solving and risk mitigation. Accomplish those two things and anyone can be successful in this business. Sitting around looking for a 'sales pitch' that is never coming, and you guarantee yourself mediocrity in this business.
Be a problem solver. That's where the money resides.
Almost forgot - there are also some who took a few of my early ideas that I shared in public, 'repackaged' them and have since presented them in public as their own. I know who these people are, because I know my own work, LOL! But, I've never complained about it and I will never seek the credit for what they do. They know who they are, however. They will also remain nameless, heretofore.
There are people trading what I taught years ago, behind the scenes - of that you can be quite sure. But, I have no desire to rehash and re-teach all of that now.
I went through all the posts of yours many times and now I'm just researching with all the ideas I'm getting and know I will be doing great. So thanks for that!
But I would like to ask you a question about the PSAR Event Horizon though it is not something I'm trying to follow anymore, I just looked a bit into it before. You said "Now, all you have to do is figure out the vertical magnitude of the market, to determine the full length of the parabola in charge."
So I was just wondering do you actually mean you can know ahead of time the length of the parabola in charge? If so then all you have to do is enter to the opposite side of the Parabola in charge at close to the half point and exit/reverse direction at the half point of the next parabola. I'm talking about the visible indicator parabola though at which point will be no longer in charge. So I guess if you know how long the one in charge would be you would just follow it fully.
So I was just wondering if this is actually what you meant. Because you added it in rather late like it was a minor point and the last thing to figure out.
Thanks,
feelnot
Edit: Didn't notice your new thread. Thanks for it will read! Not going to clutter it with my nonsense though.
with klitschko's both at once . I like the idea of what was given as in creating own indicators from OHLC deltas of different bars of data, also there wouldn't have been as much to go through if people hadn't trashed his threads. 95% of traders supposedly lose so out the box thinking is surely not such a bad thing and his ideas are certainly out of what I would call the box! Anyway this is on harmonics and I am nowhere near being able to give this thread any substance so, later!