NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





CQG Q Trader


Discussion in Platforms and Indicators

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one xplorer with 74 posts (44 thanks)
    2. looks_two jokertrader with 58 posts (18 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Japhro with 53 posts (33 thanks)
    4. looks_4 mattz with 25 posts (17 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one mattz with 0.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two xplorer with 0.6 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Japhro with 0.6 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 jokertrader with 0.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 96,239 views
    2. thumb_up 174 thanks given
    3. group 45 followers
    1. forum 317 posts
    2. attach_file 27 attachments




 
Search this Thread

CQG Q Trader

  #281 (permalink)
 
mattz's Avatar
 mattz   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 2,493 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 2,441
Thanks Received: 3,791


xplorer View Post
I respect your expert opinion Matt, and sincerely hope that's not the case.

While CQG Desktop is making advances (I understand), it does not appear nearly as user friendly as QTrader at the moment.

Plus, QTrader really is nothing more but a skinned version of IC, which I don't think will disappear any time soon, given it's supposed to be CQG's flagship product. QTrader and IC tend to be released hand in hand as, again, the engine is the same.

I'm sure I'm not saying anything you don't know but I thought it'd be worth pointing this out for the thread's consumer anyway.

My comments are just a result of the trend that I see not only in the finance/trading industry but worldwide. Downloadable software is becoming a thing of the past. Web-based products can run on any operating system, any mobile device and if you wish to upgrade to a new version you do not have to do anything.

Consider what a hassle it is today to demo a downloadable product. Download, then insert data, then connect.
Now look at the CQG desktop; it takes about 30 seconds to get the demo up and running.

The reality is that downloadable software has become expensive to maintain and support. We saw TT, CQG and MarketDelta cloud migrate to web-based execution.

From the CQG products, I am a big fan of CQG Trader. It is a downloadable product. But, just because I like, it does not mean that I can't see the industry trend.

What we see now is gen one of web-based applications and I sure that we will see significant upgrades in latency and design in the years to come.

Thanks,
Matt Z
Optimus Futures

There is a substantial risk of loss in futures trading. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected]
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
How to apply profiles
Traders Hideout
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
Pivot Indicator like the old SwingTemp by Big Mike
NinjaTrader
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
33 thanks
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
28 thanks
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
24 thanks
Bigger Wins or Fewer Losses?
23 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
21 thanks
  #282 (permalink)
 Japhro 
Canada
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra
Broker: AMP/Rithmic
Trading: NQ, ES, YM, UB
Posts: 213 since Aug 2013
Thanks Given: 33
Thanks Received: 195


xplorer View Post
I respect your expert opinion Matt, and sincerely hope that's not the case.

While CQG Desktop is making advances (I understand), it does not appear nearly as user friendly as QTrader at the moment.

Plus, QTrader really is nothing more but a skinned version of IC, which I don't think will disappear any time soon, given it's supposed to be CQG's flagship product. QTrader and IC tend to be released hand in hand as, again, the engine is the same.

I'm sure I'm not saying anything you don't know but I thought it'd be worth pointing this out for the thread's consumer anyway.

Agree, CQG M (Desktop) is not terribly user-friendly yet for trading, order entry and changes are cumbersome, slow and the charting capability is still very rudimentary. I think if CQG ends up forcing users into that they will lose business. Just imo. CQG has a lot of great technology, but in my view they are a bit scattered when it comes to product offerings. IC is great but lacks some simple things, and the a la carte pricing is way out of line with what other platforms can do for a fraction of the cost now (ie Sierra).

My personal rant here but I own a number of platforms and have leased many others and many are so close to being great, but fall short by simply missing one or two things that they could add but simply refuse to. So you need multiple platforms for charting and execution and multiple data fees/accounts then they want to consider you a pro for fees, it's all a mess. The industry badly needs to get its act together, imo.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #283 (permalink)
heispark
Seoul Korea
 
Posts: 16 since Mar 2018
Thanks Given: 18
Thanks Received: 1



Japhro View Post
Agree, CQG M (Desktop) is not terribly user-friendly yet for trading, order entry and changes are cumbersome, slow and the charting capability is still very rudimentary. I think if CQG ends up forcing users into that they will lose business. Just imo. CQG has a lot of great technology, but in my view they are a bit scattered when it comes to product offerings. IC is great but lacks some simple things, and the a la carte pricing is way out of line with what other platforms can do for a fraction of the cost now (ie Sierra).

My personal rant here but I own a number of platforms and have leased many others and many are so close to being great, but fall short by simply missing one or two things that they could add but simply refuse to. So you need multiple platforms for charting and execution and multiple data fees/accounts then they want to consider you a pro for fees, it's all a mess. The industry badly needs to get its act together, imo.

Yes, I didn't know Futures business is mess up like this. I regret I decided to migrate from Forex to Futures. Forex is much simpler and well-structured/shaped under the common standard....

Reply With Quote
  #284 (permalink)
 
mattz's Avatar
 mattz   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 2,493 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 2,441
Thanks Received: 3,791


heispark View Post
Yes, I didn't know Futures business is mess up like this. I regret I decided to migrate from Forex to Futures. Forex is much simpler and well-structured/shaped under the common standard....

This is a discussion of one platform. It is not representative of the Futures world.
Most find the Futures world rather standardized, except that you just have to choose the right software for it.
If you were able to manage the FX world where every broker makes his/own her spreads, swaps, etc. you could manage the Futures world (in my opinion).

Thanks,
Matt Z
Optimus Futures

There is a substantial risk of loss in futures trading. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected]
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #285 (permalink)
 Japhro 
Canada
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Sierra
Broker: AMP/Rithmic
Trading: NQ, ES, YM, UB
Posts: 213 since Aug 2013
Thanks Given: 33
Thanks Received: 195


mattz View Post
This is a discussion of one platform. It is not representative of the Futures world.
Most find the Futures world rather standardized, except that you just have to choose the right software for it.
If you were able to manage the FX world where every broker makes his/own her spreads, swaps, etc. you could manage the Futures world (in my opinion).

Thanks,
Matt Z
Optimus Futures

There is a substantial risk of loss in futures trading. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Agree with this, the Forex world might seem simpler with most users using MT4 or MT5 and everything seems free but you pay for it in spread.

Futures are regulated, and you trade in standard sized bites with known commissions fees, plenty of liquidity etc.
The issue I have with futures sometimes is that with 3rd party platforms some can do this or that well but not options too, for example. So I end up running 2-3 platforms, charting, execution, and orderflow etc. It can be a pain.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #286 (permalink)
 
xplorer's Avatar
 xplorer 
London UK
Site Moderator
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: CQG
Broker: S5
Trading: Futures
Posts: 5,973 since Sep 2015
Thanks Given: 15,493
Thanks Received: 15,387

Today I found out by accident that with my CME standard exchange data feed I also have access to NYSE TICK and TRIN in QTrader.

Not that I will use it right away but useful to know it's available.



For those that may find it useful, the CQG codes are DJTIC and DJTRN.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #287 (permalink)
 
xplorer's Avatar
 xplorer 
London UK
Site Moderator
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: CQG
Broker: S5
Trading: Futures
Posts: 5,973 since Sep 2015
Thanks Given: 15,493
Thanks Received: 15,387

Been experiencing access issues today, both on the CQG platform as well as via NinjaTrader with a Continuum (which is CQG) login.

CQG are aware, they sent out this comms


Quoting 
Hello,

There are some delays with Trader ID’s logging in today, this is being investigated and connections are being made after a few attempts.

The below notification has been sent to all FCMs and we will update once the issue is resolved.



CQG Login Delays
Some users are reporting unsuccessful login attempts which could be due to a slight delay in authentication.
Users will be able to log on after a few attempts.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused.


Reply With Quote
  #288 (permalink)
 
NinjaTrader's Avatar
 NinjaTrader  NinjaTrader is an official Site Sponsor
Site Sponsor

Web: NinjaTrader
AMA: Ask Me Anything
Webinars: NinjaTrader Webinars
Elite offer: Click here
 
Posts: 1,713 since May 2010
Thanks Given: 203
Thanks Received: 2,686


xplorer View Post
Been experiencing access issues today, both on the CQG platform as well as via NinjaTrader with a Continuum (which is CQG) login.

CQG are aware, they sent out this comms

CQG confirms that this issue is resolved.

Disclosure: This communication is sent to you by NinjaTrader, LLC, a software development company which owns and supports all proprietary technology relating to and including the NinjaTrader trading platform.
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #289 (permalink)
 
LDog's Avatar
 LDog 
Lafayette, TN/USA
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: SC,TastyWorks,ToS
Broker: TDA, OANDA,AMP/CQG/SC
Trading: Looking for it/them
Posts: 210 since Sep 2015
Thanks Given: 11,919
Thanks Received: 344


NinjaTrader View Post
CQG confirms that this issue is resolved.

Do you know if this was related to the issues during the Sunday night open?

Thanks for the heads up!

Reply With Quote
  #290 (permalink)
 
NinjaTrader's Avatar
 NinjaTrader  NinjaTrader is an official Site Sponsor
Site Sponsor

Web: NinjaTrader
AMA: Ask Me Anything
Webinars: NinjaTrader Webinars
Elite offer: Click here
 
Posts: 1,713 since May 2010
Thanks Given: 203
Thanks Received: 2,686



LDog View Post
Do you know if this was related to the issues during the Sunday night open?

Thanks for the heads up!

Unfortunately, I do not know.

Disclosure: This communication is sent to you by NinjaTrader, LLC, a software development company which owns and supports all proprietary technology relating to and including the NinjaTrader trading platform.
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on December 27, 2019


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts