Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I'm trying to decide on a rule of thumb for deciding if a contract isn't liquid enough to trade. I was thinking vol over 1k and open interest over 5k. What do you all think? How low can you go and still be able to get out of a contract? A lot of these mini contracts are intriguing, but I'm just not sure if the liquidity is there. Also, I'm not talking about short term trading, I'm thinking more like a few weeks to months. Thanks in advance!
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,049 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,388
Thanks Received: 10,208
With regards to the mini contracts many of the low volumes do not equate to low liquidity. For example if you watch QG (NatGas) or QM (Crude) you will see that the market in the first two months is almost always 1 tick wide. Just because its not trading tick by tick with NG and CL doesn't mean the liquidity isn't there.
Well this thread has flat lined..... I really thought that it would get some conversation going. I assumed most people trading futures had their liquidity rules in mind. oh well....
Most traders are concerned with liquidity and for the most part what I have seen is that people trade according to the liquidity they see in the market: indices, metals, energy, treasuries, etc.
They do not need to check the liquidity on that because it is reflected in their fills and execution.
The mini contracts are slightly less liquid but might still serve you well if you have a smaller account.
But, lack of liquidity may have its own issues. For example, I remember many years ago we had a situation where on the mini gold a stop was not triggered because of the price gap and the stop has been turned by the exchange to a limit because the price gap was too large(?).
Anyway, there is only so much you can discuss liquidity and sooner or later you will realize that the popular products are better, in my opinion, for execution if you are a short-term trader.
Thanks,
Matt Z
Optimus Futures
There is a substantial risk of loss in futures trading. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected]
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,049 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,388
Thanks Received: 10,208
I gave you what I believe to be a good answer regarding liquidity. You replied with a factual statement about OI unrelated to liquidity. I'm not sure what else to say.
And while you are right many people are concerned about liquidity, but most of them are trading full size contracts.
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,049 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,388
Thanks Received: 10,208
That's an interesting point. Since the mini's don't trade tick for tick with full size the last trade could be an old print which when combined with a gap, means the next trade exceeds exchange max move criteria.
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,049 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,388
Thanks Received: 10,208
I don't want to appear that you've ruffled feathers (you haven't) I just don't know what else you expect someone to say. I just checked QM (which is the CME/NYMEX Crude Oil eMini) and it's OI last night was 1418 with Volume 13909. As I said earlier the bid-ask in QM is nearly always 1 tic wide, so yes it's very possible for a contract with only 1428 OI to have excellent liquidity. I don't trade YI so can not speak to its liquidity.