A case for trading a combination of CL and QM - Commodities Futures Trading | futures io social day trading
futures io futures trading


A case for trading a combination of CL and QM
Updated: Views / Replies:1,396 / 1
Created: by RM99 Attachments:0

Welcome to futures io.

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

futures io is the largest futures trading community on the planet, with over 90,000 members. At futures io, our goal has always been and always will be to create a friendly, positive, forward-thinking community where members can openly share and discuss everything the world of trading has to offer. The community is one of the friendliest you will find on any subject, with members going out of their way to help others. Some of the primary differences between futures io and other trading sites revolve around the standards of our community. Those standards include a code of conduct for our members, as well as extremely high standards that govern which partners we do business with, and which products or services we recommend to our members.

At futures io, our focus is on quality education. No hype, gimmicks, or secret sauce. The truth is: trading is hard. To succeed, you need to surround yourself with the right support system, educational content, and trading mentors Ė all of which you can find on futures io, utilizing our social trading environment.

With futures io, you can find honest trading reviews on brokers, trading rooms, indicator packages, trading strategies, and much more. Our trading review process is highly moderated to ensure that only genuine users are allowed, so you donít need to worry about fake reviews.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading sites:
  • We are here to help. Just let us know what you need.
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive in our community.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, we can help you find it.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 

A case for trading a combination of CL and QM

  #1 (permalink)
Fortitudo et Honor
Austin, TX
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: TradeStation
Favorite Futures: Futures
 
Posts: 882 since Mar 2011
Thanks: 128 given, 703 received

A case for trading a combination of CL and QM

Qualifications and Assumptions:

Assuming you have a profitable strategy observed over some time period.

Assume that strategy has a maximum observed drawdown that's reasonable (equal to or less than the marginal reserve value for one contract).

Assume the strategy is not a scalping strategy and goes after mid-large size moves that are fairly resistant to slippage considerations (100-500 tick moves on CL).

Assume that you're employing a money management system that holds drawdown reserve until you double your initial investment (initial investment = marginal reserve + drawdown reserve and any extra).

So, if you had say....$20k account. Let's say you observed a profit of $25k over 6 months (trading 1 contract) with a maximum drawdown of $5750.

If you followed the management plan above.....

You would scale according to this schedule:
1-12k profit (1 contract) for a profit of 12k (32k account balance).
12-18k profit (2 contracts) for a profit of 12k (44k account balance).
Now you can forgoe the drawdown reserve and amplify/maximize the runups/drawdowns and total return. You will hold this as a sacred reserve.

18-20k (3 contracts) for a profit of 6k (50k account balance)
20-22k (4 contracts) for a profit of 8k (58k account balance)
22-24k (5 contracts) for a profit of 10k (68k account balance)
24-25k (6 contracts) for a profit of 6k (72k account balance).

Now, let's compare with QM (E-Mini).

You observe slightly less profit at half the rate of CL. ($12k profit).
Your drawdown correlates almost perfectly. so with drawdown reserve, you're trading $6k/mini contract.
You begin with the same starting capital of $20k.

That means you can start with trading 3 minis (already you can see that more of your capital is at work for you...$18k of the minis starting out and only $12k of the CL starting out).

so it follows this schedule...

1-2k (3 contracts) for a profit of 6k (26k account balance).
2-3k (4 contracts) for a profit of 8k (32k account balance).
3-4k (5 contracts) for a profit of 10k (42k account balance).
Again, from here on, you maintain the $40k sacred minimum and you operate with no drawdown reserve for future position increases. This will mean you'll have to scale out somewhat in drawdowns, but you'll also have larger run ups.

4-5k(7 contracts) for a profit of 7k (49k account balance).
5-6k(9 contracts) for a profit of 9k (58k account balance).
6-7k(12 contracts) for a profit of 12k (70k account balance).
7-8k(16 contracts) for a profit of 16k (86k account balance).
8-9k(21 contracts) for a profit of 21k (107k account balance).
9-10k(28 contracts) for a profit of 28k (135k account balance).
10-11k(37 contracts) for a profit of 37k (172k account balance).
11-12k(49 contracts) for a profit of 49k (211k account balance).



Now, in fairness, there are some assumptions that must be addressed. 1) The strategy has a high netprofit/trade value. Strategies that have a large trading volume will be significantly effected by increased commissions of the mini. 2) Volume saturation. I'm not very familiar with acceptible trading volumes for the mini, so you might "saturate" and reach an unfavorable level as your positionsizes grow with the minis. What that level is...I dunno.

But as you can see, the effect is pronounced. By essentially increasing the rate at which you're able to compound your earnings, you increase your overall bottom line significantly.

This has always been one of the drawbacks of futures contracts....they're discrete in nature and you can only increase position sizes in large increment levels (as opposed to equities which are more continuous/fluid....the size of even the largest shares are small compared to a future contract margin requirement).

The ability to quickly "rollover" your money has a profound effect. Thus, if you're starting or operating with a smaller account, trading minis, at least for the first few profit cycles, might be a more profitable approach.

I would suspect that some additional work needs doing to optimize using a combination of trading minis at first, then transitioning to the larger "full" CL contracts and maybe even leveraging the scraps of your account (the remainder of what's leftover after you trade your CL margin reserve+drawdown reserve).

As I said...if you have $20k, and your drawdown is about 100% of the value of the CL contract, then with a $20k account you can only "safely" trade 1 contract. But with mini's you can put more of that leftover/remainder to work for you (instead of sitting on the sidelines in reserve).

"A dumb man never learns. A smart man learns from his own failure and success. But a wise man learns from the failure and success of others."
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to RM99 for this post:
 
  #2 (permalink)
Quick Summary
Quick Summary Post

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.


Reply



futures io > > > > A case for trading a combination of CL and QM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

Jigsaw Trading: TBA

Elite only

FuturesTrader71: TBA

Elite only

NinjaTrader: TBA

Jan 18

RandBots: TBA

Jan 23

GFF Brokers & CME Group: Futures & Bitcoin

Elite only

Adam Grimes: TBA

Elite only

Ran Aroussi: TBA

Elite only
     

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minimum Scalp Targets for TF, CL, and QM dallasstarsfan Emini Index Futures Trading 6 April 17th, 2013 11:30 PM
CL vs QM (crude oil) tick size/value, margins Big Mike Commodities Futures Trading 23 April 9th, 2013 09:10 PM
SEC Dismisses Insider Trading Case Against Rajat Gupta kbit News and Current Events 0 August 4th, 2011 07:07 PM
Gupta's Insider-Trading Case Could Be Bigger Than Madoff Quick Summary News and Current Events 0 March 1st, 2011 07:20 PM
Question about CL and QM Contracts DannyG Traders Hideout 22 December 6th, 2009 08:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.

Copyright © 2017 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts
Page generated 2017-12-15 in 0.08 seconds with 19 queries on phoenix via your IP 54.226.132.197