NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Interactive Brokers: please, please, just stay away


Discussion in Brokers

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one josh with 6 posts (40 thanks)
    2. looks_two Anagami with 2 posts (2 thanks)
    3. looks_3 SMCJB with 2 posts (3 thanks)
    4. looks_4 MrMojoRisin with 2 posts (4 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one josh with 6.7 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Futures Operator with 3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 MrMojoRisin with 2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 SMCJB with 1.5 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 10,254 views
    2. thumb_up 60 thanks given
    3. group 12 followers
    1. forum 19 posts
    2. attach_file 3 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Interactive Brokers: please, please, just stay away

  #11 (permalink)
 
josh's Avatar
 josh 
Georgia, US
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: None
Platform: SC
Broker: Denali+Rithmic
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Posts: 6,216 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 6,752
Thanks Received: 18,136


1BSD View Post

Assuming IB's size also played a role in your going with them too, mind me asking where or with what other well funded broker you'd consider going next, and that also allows you to link up with a decent third player charting / order software ?



Thanks and best of luck in the meantime !!!



:-)

Actually the primary reason I am using them is for managing several IRA accounts. They have financial advisor roles and I can allocate positions based on a number of factors to a subset of those accounts, using a single master account. Additionally, they have the nice benefit of allowing a wide variety of asset classes in a single account. So, in one IRA I can own stocks, futures, bonds, etc. To do this normally takes a self-directed IRA approach which becomes more costly. I'm still considering moving to that structure, however, because of IB's shortcomings which I have highlighted here.

For the record, the above issue about canceled orders did not affect me. But it's things like this which just become a hassle.

To be fair, every broker has issues so I'm not singling out IB as the only broker with issues! But, they have significant ones which have affected me in the past.



Sent using the NexusFi mobile app

Started this thread Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
NexusFi Journal Challenge - April 2024
Feedback and Announcements
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
Online prop firm The Funded Trader (TFT) going under?
Traders Hideout
Deepmoney LLM
Elite Quantitative GenAI/LLM
My NT8 Volume Profile Split by Asian/Euro/Open
NinjaTrader
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Get funded firms 2023/2024 - Any recommendations or word …
59 thanks
Funded Trader platforms
37 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
22 thanks
NexusFi site changelog and issues/problem reporting
22 thanks
The Program
20 thanks
  #12 (permalink)
 
SMCJB's Avatar
 SMCJB 
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT and Stellar
Broker: Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,041 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,375
Thanks Received: 10,192


josh View Post
lol, how nice of them to let clients know... 90 minutes after the session started.


Unfortunately adding new gateways always results in GTC's getting cancelled and isn't specific to Interactive. I do agree though, that I would expect to be informed, at least once, probably twice, BEFORE it happens, not 90 mins after the next session opens!

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #13 (permalink)
 Futures Operator 
New York, NY
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart, thinkorswim
Broker: Amp-Rithmic/TT, IB
Trading: CL, GC, NQ
Posts: 601 since Nov 2010
Thanks Given: 2,039
Thanks Received: 258


I agree with the OP to stay away from IB. My problem is also with stops not executing reliably. This problem caused a significant loss, on notable size position for me.

By default, IB will NOT execute your stops in futures outside 'their' per instrument RTH hours, ie until 9:30am in Crude, which makes no sense to me.

It's not possible to globally configure this setting for their Web Trader. You can configure it in TWS. If you set a stop order using IBKR Mobile, the TWS setting will not apply and the stop will not execute outside their RTH hours. The setting also needs to be configured independently for IBKR Mobile.

Even with the setting set correctly in TWS, they failed to execute a stop in Crude in early January. I filed a complaint with them, and they said investigating for 20 days. I have followed up multiple times and they have yet to respond, it has been 2.5 months.

Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)
 
SMCJB's Avatar
 SMCJB 
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT and Stellar
Broker: Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,041 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,375
Thanks Received: 10,192

NFA Press Release
April 14, 2022


For Immediate Release
For more information contact:
Christie Hillsman, 312-781-1497, [email protected]
Karen Wuertz, 312-781-1335, [email protected]

NFA orders Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers LLC to pay a $250,000 fine

April 14, Chicago?NFA has ordered Connecticut-based futures commission merchant and forex dealer Member Interactive Brokers LLC to pay a $250,000 fine.
The Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and a settlement offer submitted by Interactive Brokers, in which the firm neither admitted nor denied the allegations in the Complaint. In its Complaint, the BCC alleged that Interactive Brokers canceled retail customer forex orders contrary to the reasons permitted under NFA Compliance Rule 2-43(a)(1) and failed to adequately supervise its employees in the conduct of their forex activities on behalf of the firm to ensure compliance with the relevant NFA requirements, contrary to NFA Compliance Rule 2-36(e). In its Decision, the BCC found that Interactive Brokers violated NFA Compliance Rules 2-43(a)(1) and 2-36(e).
The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

300 S. Riverside Plaza, #1800
Chicago, IL 60606

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #15 (permalink)
 
chipwitch's Avatar
 chipwitch 
Nashville, TN
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: NinjaTrader, Continuum Data
Trading: MES for now... baby steps
Posts: 322 since Feb 2022
Thanks Given: 230
Thanks Received: 631


SMCJB View Post
NFA Press Release
April 14, 2022


For Immediate Release
For more information contact:
Christie Hillsman, 312-781-1497, [email protected]
Karen Wuertz, 312-781-1335, [email protected]

NFA orders Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers LLC to pay a $250,000 fine

April 14, Chicago?NFA has ordered Connecticut-based futures commission merchant and forex dealer Member Interactive Brokers LLC to pay a $250,000 fine.
The Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and a settlement offer submitted by Interactive Brokers, in which the firm neither admitted nor denied the allegations in the Complaint. In its Complaint, the BCC alleged that Interactive Brokers canceled retail customer forex orders contrary to the reasons permitted under NFA Compliance Rule 2-43(a)(1) and failed to adequately supervise its employees in the conduct of their forex activities on behalf of the firm to ensure compliance with the relevant NFA requirements, contrary to NFA Compliance Rule 2-36(e). In its Decision, the BCC found that Interactive Brokers violated NFA Compliance Rules 2-43(a)(1) and 2-36(e).
The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

300 S. Riverside Plaza, #1800
Chicago, IL 60606

Any brokerage that doesn't have something like this just opened yesterday. I wouldn't get too worked up unless they don't have the ability to pay the fine. LOL

Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)
 
josh's Avatar
 josh 
Georgia, US
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: None
Platform: SC
Broker: Denali+Rithmic
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Posts: 6,216 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 6,752
Thanks Received: 18,136

I'd like to very quickly update my experience with IBKR.

It's still bad, only, worse. Over the last couple of months (prior to the crazy volatility today, to be clear) a marketable limit order sometimes takes up to 12 seconds to get filled. For example, if ES is 3900.00 x 3900.25, and I place a limit to sell at 3895.00, it will sometimes take 12 seconds to fill the order. This happens both through the API (using Sierra Chart for example) and through the Interactive Brokers BookTrader itself. So, this is not a third party issue, but the problem happens in IBKR's own software! Also note that this is not a "delayed data" issue, because often to guarantee a fill, I will place the limit far enough away from the market such that I still see the delay.

The issue is directly related to volatility and order volume. For example, when the market is quiet and not much is going on, the order is often accepted within 1 or 2 seconds. It's when a huge move happens and there's an influx of orders and the market is moving (in other words, when you often most need to place an order) that it simply fails to accept in a timely fashion. Note that this also happens with stop orders. When my stop is hit, it does not trigger immediately and often takes 3-5 seconds, and I am at the mercy of market volatility.

Needless to say, this makes using it for day trading, especially in a market which can move half a percent in 1 minute, very difficult, to almost impossible. The only reason I'm still with them is their "Advisor" setup which I need. I'm still looking to switch but reluctant because it's difficult to find a replacement for the one feature I need from them.

Last note on this is that others have reported the same issue. And, my small account broker has zero latency when placing/filling orders (CQG). So, this is not an internet connectivity issue on my end.

In short, if you're a regular trader and don't need anything fancy, there is zero reason to go with IBKR. None. Their technology is inadequate and their customer support is almost non-existent (try getting ahold of someone in less than an hour, especially if things are moving). I reiterate the sentiment in the title of this thread: please, please, just stay away. The delayed fills have cost me thousands of dollars and counting. Your money deserves better.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)
 OneEye 
The Netherlands
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: proprietary
Trading: ES
Posts: 40 since Dec 2017
Thanks Given: 141
Thanks Received: 54


josh View Post
I'd like to very quickly update my experience with IBKR.

It's still bad, only, worse. Over the last couple of months (prior to the crazy volatility today, to be clear) a marketable limit order sometimes takes up to 12 seconds to get filled. For example, if ES is 3900.00 x 3900.25, and I place a limit to sell at 3895.00, it will sometimes take 12 seconds to fill the order. This happens both through the API (using Sierra Chart for example) and through the Interactive Brokers BookTrader itself. So, this is not a third party issue, but the problem happens in IBKR's own software! Also note that this is not a "delayed data" issue, because often to guarantee a fill, I will place the limit far enough away from the market such that I still see the delay.

The issue is directly related to volatility and order volume. For example, when the market is quiet and not much is going on, the order is often accepted within 1 or 2 seconds. It's when a huge move happens and there's an influx of orders and the market is moving (in other words, when you often most need to place an order) that it simply fails to accept in a timely fashion. Note that this also happens with stop orders. When my stop is hit, it does not trigger immediately and often takes 3-5 seconds, and I am at the mercy of market volatility.

Needless to say, this makes using it for day trading, especially in a market which can move half a percent in 1 minute, very difficult, to almost impossible. The only reason I'm still with them is their "Advisor" setup which I need. I'm still looking to switch but reluctant because it's difficult to find a replacement for the one feature I need from them.

Last note on this is that others have reported the same issue. And, my small account broker has zero latency when placing/filling orders (CQG). So, this is not an internet connectivity issue on my end.

In short, if you're a regular trader and don't need anything fancy, there is zero reason to go with IBKR. None. Their technology is inadequate and their customer support is almost non-existent (try getting ahold of someone in less than an hour, especially if things are moving). I reiterate the sentiment in the title of this thread: please, please, just stay away. The delayed fills have cost me thousands of dollars and counting. Your money deserves better.

I am not an IB advocate and I have no reasons to sell their product or defend them.

But to be fair, I program against their API and when I put in a maunual order (via my own software and their API) and the order is clearly in the order book, the order is filled before the key I pressed (within my own software and their API) had lifted up. Virtually 0 milliseconds delay.

===

About customer support: I get a reasonable response time when I send a mail via the TWS application and the [Contact Us] button.
I'm not saying the response itself was very helpfull..........

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #18 (permalink)
 kremat0r 
Prague, Czechia
 
Experience: Intermediate
Posts: 69 since Jan 2019
Thanks Given: 12
Thanks Received: 58

I can confirm.

Im using IBKR + SierraChart, when I had a strategy which does not rely on speed it was ok.

Now Im placing more orders and delay between click and order placed in the order book it's horrible!

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #19 (permalink)
 
josh's Avatar
 josh 
Georgia, US
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: None
Platform: SC
Broker: Denali+Rithmic
Trading: ES, NQ, YM
Posts: 6,216 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 6,752
Thanks Received: 18,136


kremat0r View Post
I can confirm.

Im using IBKR + SierraChart, when I had a strategy which does not rely on speed it was ok.

Now Im placing more orders and delay between click and order placed in the order book it's horrible!

I'd like to emphasize that I notice this delay *even when using IB's own BookTrader* ladder. I can place a marketable limit order, and it just doesn't fill. Takes several seconds. So, this issue at least for me is not a third party issue, but something I can observe in IB's own software.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)
 ZB23 
Atlanta Metro Area
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Rithmic API
Broker: Ironbeam
Trading: Futures: CL spreads, IR outright.
Frequency: Never
Duration: Never
Posts: 144 since Feb 2017
Thanks Given: 60
Thanks Received: 193


After putting in a lot of work into an algo trader, I learned that TWS is less than ideal when it comes to scalping combo spreads. I had to change my strategy from scalping to one that emphasizes swing trading, and change my timeframe from 1-minute to 1-hour.

The whole idea of having to log off once a day is just dumb.

The idea that an IBAPI algo must go through TWS is also dumb.

The only reason why I am sticking with IB is because:

1. I have invested a lot of time into learning IB's API.
2. I can leverage Python for data analysis.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on April 23, 2023


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts