Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I just opened up an IB IRA account so I could buy puts on the ten-year treasury. For some crazy reason, once the account was finally able to place a trade, my ~$2,000 purchase order was rejected because it said I must have ~$20,000 in cash on hand.
When I called, IB insisted that this was an exchange requirement, and went into all kinds of explanation about how there is unlimited risk in buying a put on a future because of performance bond requirements. However, the risk department at the CME told me that they must be confusing the risk of selling contracts with that of buying contracts. That's what I had thought as well.
It's also clear as day in the CME options on futures brochure, which says no performance-bond requirements for buying puts. I confronted IB with all of this, and their attitude was basically--well if it's not an exchange rule like we claimed previously--too bad, that's our policy. I asked how they possibly expect to keep futures options customers with this policy, and they had no answer.
So, what gives? Is this new for them? Are they really this clueless?
Apparently I can't reply to my own thread because of permissions for this website, so I'm answering here:
Shane: From what I understand, if I buy the option to open, I'm the one who asks the seller to exercise the option, causing the assignment, not the other way around. Or am I misunderstanding something?
re: the PM I got:
Yes, I know. The exchange knows it. I think even they know it from follow-up calls, but they don't appear to care. Two different people at the risk department in the CME suspected the same as I did--that perhaps IB mixed up buying options with selling them? I just don't understand how a major brokerage could be so utterly clueless to do that.
Unless it's subversive: I don't understand why anyone would buy options using IB with a cash on hand requirement like this, assuming other firms don't do the same. The only reason I could think of is that maybe it's in order to drive away customers. A reason they might want to do this in an underhanded fashion is that reportedly they disabling futures options trading without notice about a month ago for an entire week. I can't imagine they didn't put themselves at tremendous financial liability for people who couldn't trade and weren't given time to get out of IB.
I wish I could file an SEC complaint, but the exchange said brokerages can add whatever restrictions they want to a trade, however irrational, as long as they meet the exchanges' minimum restrictions.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Interactive Brokers notified me today that they are suspending futures trading in IRA accounts today. I am wondering if this is an industry wide thing or if it is specific to IB. If any others actively trade futures in their IRA accounts, I like to …
Trading: Equities, index options and futures/futures options
Posts: 190 since Apr 2010
Thanks Given: 66
Thanks Received: 198
If you buy a put (or call) then you are long the option and YOU have the choice to exercise it. If you sell the option short then you carry the risk of being assigned.