Rithmic vs. CQG Question - futures io
futures io futures trading



Rithmic vs. CQG Question


Discussion in Brokers

Updated by syswizard
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Jonson with 3 posts (0 thanks)
    2. looks_two liquidcci with 2 posts (4 thanks)
    3. looks_3 hoolio with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 xplorer with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    1. trending_up 15,058 views
    2. thumb_up 9 thanks given
    3. group 10 followers
    1. forum 17 replies
    2. attach_file 1 attachments




Welcome to futures io: the largest futures trading community on the planet, with well over 100,000 members
  • Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
  • Quality education from leading professional traders
  • We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
  • We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.  It's free and simple.

-- Big Mike, Site Administrator

(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)

 
Search this Thread
 

Rithmic vs. CQG Question

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
Salt Lake City Utah USA
 
 
Posts: 10 since Dec 2013
Thanks: 18 given, 1 received

For those of you who've used both feeds, do you have a preference and why? The demo's I've tested seem like I get a faster fill using CQG, and the quotes seem to be coming in a tiny bit faster than Rithmic. In live trading is CQG and Rithmic comparable with fills? Does it matter what FCM's you use with the data feed?

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on futures io?
NinjaTrader 8 with TD Ameritrade futures
NinjaTrader
Book discussion: Automated Stock Trading Systems
Traders Hideout
Do You Have A PlayBooks/What Form Does It Take?
Traders Hideout
Zytrade Brokerage Review (www.zytrade.com)
Brokers
Range bar differences in Tradestation vs. TOS
TradeStation
 
 
(login for full post details)
  #3 (permalink)
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: CL, NG, TF, NQ, YM, GC, ES
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 
Posts: 863 since Jun 2011
Thanks: 609 given, 1,067 received


I have used both with Ninja. You will not be able to visually tell any difference in speed. They both are fast to fast for human eye to determine anything. I had nothing but problems with CQG feed. I wanted to like it because of the server side OCO but to many disconnects. This may not be everyones experience but for me it was not good.

Rithmic has been rock solid. If you need speed you can colocate with Rithmic directly and are tied directly into their engine. When I say directly you are on same router with the engine. Its not cheap but is worth it.

I also would not rely on demos to tell you anything as demo may be slower.

"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to liquidcci for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #4 (permalink)
Market Wizard
New Orleans, La (Mardi Gras City)
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Ninjatrader / Optimus Futures / AmpFutures
Trading: ES / 6E / 6B / CL
 
DavidHP's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,339 since Aug 2009
Thanks: 9,328 given, 2,339 received


liquidcci View Post
I have used both with Ninja. You will not be able to visually tell any difference in speed. They both are fast to fast for human eye to determine anything.

I disagree.
I can see the difference in the two feeds.
Especially on days like today (Fed Meeting release days)

All day the market has been slow.
Just before a Fed decision I always reboot my machine and restart NT.

I've noticed when the decision comes in there is a mass of data.
Just after the Fed announcement...
When I'm connected to CQG I get a lot of pausing and spurts of data and freezing.
When connected to Rithmic none of that exists.

I can connect to Rithmic and let it stream and get consistent data.
Then disconnect and connect to CQG and I get data then pauses then an ORANGE Connected from NT.
(That means it is still connected but not optimal)

If I disconnect and connect again to Rithmic, no data pauses.
Perhaps it is just my connection but it happens too often for me to think otherwise.

If I do a ping test I get consistent ping results with either connection to a third party IP address.

The slow down appears to only be between my NT and the CQG connection.

FWIW

Rejoice in the Thunderstorms of Life . . .
Knowing it's not about Clouds or Wind. . .
But Learning to Dance in the Rain ! ! !
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
The following 5 users say Thank You to DavidHP for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #5 (permalink)
Russia, St.Petersburg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, CQG Desktop
Broker: NinjaTrader/CQG
Trading: Futures
 
Jonson's Avatar
 
Posts: 243 since Jan 2011
Thanks: 211 given, 114 received

i use a rithmic and like it

* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #6 (permalink)
Russia, St.Petersburg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, CQG Desktop
Broker: NinjaTrader/CQG
Trading: Futures
 
Jonson's Avatar
 
Posts: 243 since Jan 2011
Thanks: 211 given, 114 received


SpencerEng View Post
For those of you who've used both feeds, do you have a preference and why? The demo's I've tested seem like I get a faster fill using CQG, and the quotes seem to be coming in a tiny bit faster than Rithmic. In live trading is CQG and Rithmic comparable with fills? Does it matter what FCM's you use with the data feed?

t4 feed - try it too

* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #7 (permalink)
Austin, TX
 
Experience: Master
Platform: ninjatrader, r-trader
Trading: CL, NG, TF, NQ, YM, GC, ES
 
liquidcci's Avatar
 
Posts: 863 since Jun 2011
Thanks: 609 given, 1,067 received

@DavidHP I can't say I disagree with that. Typically it is almost impossible to see a feed difference with human eye. But under those circumstances where a lot of data is coming in I can see where would be easy to see. My experience with rithmic has personally been much better than CQG.


DavidHP View Post
I disagree.
I can see the difference in the two feeds.
Especially on days like today (Fed Meeting release days)

All day the market has been slow.
Just before a Fed decision I always reboot my machine and restart NT.

I've noticed when the decision comes in there is a mass of data.
Just after the Fed announcement...
When I'm connected to CQG I get a lot of pausing and spurts of data and freezing.
When connected to Rithmic none of that exists.

I can connect to Rithmic and let it stream and get consistent data.
Then disconnect and connect to CQG and I get data then pauses then an ORANGE Connected from NT.
(That means it is still connected but not optimal)

If I disconnect and connect again to Rithmic, no data pauses.
Perhaps it is just my connection but it happens too often for me to think otherwise.

If I do a ping test I get consistent ping results with either connection to a third party IP address.

The slow down appears to only be between my NT and the CQG connection.

FWIW


"The day I became a winning trader was the day it became boring. Daily losses no longer bother me and daily wins no longer excited me. Took years of pain and busting a few accounts before finally got my mind right. I survived the darkness within and now just chillax and let my black box do the work."
Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to liquidcci for this post:
 
(login for full post details)
  #8 (permalink)
Destin, FL / EU (Brno, Czech Rep.)
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: R|Trader, NinjaTrader, JForex
Trading: CL, NQ, TF, 6E
 
Keen4Snow's Avatar
 
Posts: 19 since Apr 2010
Thanks: 2 given, 14 received


Jonson View Post
i use a rithmic and like it

what's your access time to Rithmic servers?
I've got under 60 ms from central Europe when using Europe gateway.
Good job...It used to be 140 ms using standard Chicago gateway.

RTrader/Window/Preferences/Performance/Ping

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #9 (permalink)
Maastricht, The netherlands
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Ninjatrader and Multicharts
Trading: ES,NQ.YM and dutch stocks
 
Posts: 15 since Nov 2011
Thanks: 2 given, 1 received

When you are a algo trader and you do trade the futures market you need CQG. CQG offers month of tick data rithmic offers only one day of tickdata.

Reply With Quote
 
(login for full post details)
  #10 (permalink)
Russia, St.Petersburg
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, CQG Desktop
Broker: NinjaTrader/CQG
Trading: Futures
 
Jonson's Avatar
 
Posts: 243 since Jan 2011
Thanks: 211 given, 114 received



Keen4Snow View Post
what's your access time to Rithmic servers?
I've got under 60 ms from central Europe when using Europe gateway.
Good job...It used to be 140 ms using standard Chicago gateway.

RTrader/Window/Preferences/Performance/Ping

hi
55 ms from central Europe

* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
Reply With Quote


futures io Trading Community Trading Reviews and Vendors Brokers > Rithmic vs. CQG Question


September 14, 2020


Upcoming Webinars and Events
 

NinjaTrader (special webinar #400 w/giveaways)

Oct TBD
 

Bookmap

Oct TBD
 

SharkIndicators

Oct TBD
 

Carley Garner

Oct TBD
 

Ironbeam

Oct TBD
 

Zytrade

Oct TBD
 

GruttePier

Oct TBD
     



Copyright © 2020 by futures io, s.a., Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama, +507 833-9432, info@futures.io
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts