Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
IQFeed and Rithmic volume difference due to implied trades?
Hello,
this is my first post so please forgive me if I don’t obey all the rules yet, have been lurking around for some months though…
I know these topics have been discussed elsewhere, but I think not my specific question.
I’m currently on an IQFeed trial (with live ICE US data) and also on a Rithmic trial via Optimus. I recorded live market data for Cocoa (CCK12) for Feb 16 and observed differences in the reported trades: Rithmic reported/sent more trades than IQfeed.
IQfeed’s customer service told me that they don’t report every trade, they are not sending “implied trades”, i.e. trades from the internal matching engine. So their total volume field is not 100% explained by the incremental volumes.
For Feb 16, IQfeed tick-based volume (i.e. summing volume over all trades) for CCK12 is 14,419 and Rithmic tick-based volume is 16,521. Both report total volume of 16,523. So it seems to me that the Rithmic feed would be “more complete” and sent probably also implied trades.
The exchange reports total volume for CCK12 on Feb 16 of 17,264 (thereof EFP 406, Block Trade 77 and Spread Volume 4852). Implied trades should be related to the spread volume but I cannot reconcile the figures completely…
Am I missing something? What do you think about reporting of implied trades? Would that make Rithmic more accurate for some kind of volume analysis?
Does anyone know how ICE calculates (or defines) spread volume per (outright) contract?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Rithmic provide information based upon implied trades (from spreads). Rithmic also provide information based upon conditioned trades (a block trade may one type of condition) but it would be shown in different fields (the condition trade fields). the volume Rithmic report is the volume that the exchange tells them has traded.
Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected]
OK, Rithmic reports trades resulting from implied orders and IQFEED doesn't.
Do you know, whether one can somehow reconcile that difference (in terms of volume) with the "Spread Volume" for that contract as reported by the exchange?
In my case:
I wil try here to do an analysis and comparation on different data feeds and platforms to perfom studies involving bid/ask data, like comulative bid/ask difference or delta bars and footprint like.
