Rithmic vs AMP/CQG (Page 11) - Brokers and Data Feeds | futures.io
futures.io futures trading

Go Back   futures.io

> Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Traders Hideout > Brokers and Data Feeds

Rithmic vs AMP/CQG
Started:August 14th, 2011 (09:31 AM) by traderjcf Views / Replies:30,871 / 101
Last Reply:February 5th, 2014 (05:12 AM) Attachments:4

Welcome to futures.io.

Welcome, Guest!

This forum was established to help traders (especially futures traders) by openly sharing indicators, strategies, methods, trading journals and discussing the psychology of trading.

We are fundamentally different than most other trading forums:
  • We work extremely hard to keep things positive on our forums.
  • We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendor advertising in posts.
  • We firmly believe in openness and encourage sharing. The holy grail is within you, it is not something tangible you can download.
  • We expect our members to participate and become a part of the community. Help yourself by helping others.

You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free and simple, and we will never resell your private information.

-- Big Mike

Thread Tools Search this Thread

Rithmic vs AMP/CQG

Old February 4th, 2014, 08:01 PM   #101 (permalink)
Elite Member
Beaverton, Canada
Futures Experience: Beginner
Platform: Ninjatrader
Favorite Futures: Currency Futures
Posts: 97 since Dec 2012
Thanks: 902 given, 95 received

shanemcdonald28 View Post
This week, I am running rithmic and cqg on Multicharts on separate machines with same setup , workspaces, charts, and autotrading signals.

I am running ninja on cqg as well.

Sunday night at around 8 pm, all 3 disconnected. Rithmic reconnected after about 20 seconds. Ninja/cqg took around 4 minutes to reconnect and cqg/MC did not reconnect at all. I had to manually reconnect it and restart autotrade.

That is only incident so far.

Other than the disconnect/reconnect, did you notice any differences in performance between Rithmic vs CQG? Thanks

Reply With Quote

Old February 5th, 2014, 05:12 AM   #102 (permalink)
Trading for Profit
new york
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: X Trader, Sierra Charts, Multicharts
Broker/Data: AMP/TT, Vision/Rithmic, AMP/CQG
Favorite Futures: CL, NG, gold
Posts: 355 since Mar 2012
Thanks: 665 given, 567 received

No, they appear to be working the same.
I cannot find anything so far.


Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to shanemcdonald28 for this post:


futures.io > Futures Trading, News, Charts and Platforms > Traders Hideout > Brokers and Data Feeds > Rithmic vs AMP/CQG

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Upcoming Webinars and Events (4:30PM ET unless noted)

NinjaTrader 8: Programming Profitable Trading Edges w/Scott Hodson

Elite only

Anthony Drager: Executing on Intermarket Correlations & Order Flow, Part 2

Elite only

Adam Grimes: Five critically important keys to professional trading

Elite only

Machine Learning Concepts w/FIO member NJAMC

Elite only

MarketDelta Cloud Platform: Announcing new mobile features

Dec 1

NinjaTrader 8: Features and Enhancements

Dec 6

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rithmic Zoethecus Brokers and Data Feeds 195 May 30th, 2016 12:10 PM
AMP, CQG, and NT7 MXASJ Brokers and Data Feeds 169 October 11th, 2013 09:55 AM
Anybody having problems w/ AMP/CQG loss off connection Rayzor Brokers and Data Feeds 110 November 2nd, 2011 05:29 AM
CQG platform (CQG Trader/CQG Integrated Client) Big Mike CQG 91 July 24th, 2011 08:46 AM
Rithmic and matlab tradersheldon Matlab, R project and Python 1 January 28th, 2011 12:16 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Copyright © 2016 by futures.io. All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
no new posts

Page generated 2016-10-28 in 0.07 seconds with 20 queries on phoenix via your IP