Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Hey. I'm new here, I couldn't find a forum for general questions, so I hope this is an appropriate place for this one.
I need help figuring out what a "recession" is actually made of. Can someone help me understand this. Officially, the Early 2000s Recession was from March, 2001 to November 2001 (highlighted square), but as you see in the chart, the stock market continued declining for about another year after that (highlighted circle). Why is that subsequent period not considered part of that recession?
Unlike the Great recession around 2018 which officially lasted from Dec 2007–June 2009, (1 year and 6 months) which does officially capture the whole move down:
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
You might find some information in these PDFs useful.
--------------------------------------------------------
- Trade what you see. Invest in what you believe -
--------------------------------------------------------
There's no necessary connection between the stock market and a recession. Generally, two or more back-to-back quarters of negative growth of the economy (not of the stock market) are involved in a recession, but it can be more complex than that.
The stock market may go down in a recession, or it may go down before the recession starts, and it may start to go up before the recession is over, or it may go down and then up in step with the recession, or it may still be down after the recession in the general economy ends or it may go down and there may not be a recession. There is often some relationship, but it doesn't have to be the same all the time.
So the answer to the question you ask about why a period where the market was down was not considered part of a particular recession is basically, "They are different things, so why not?"
Bob.
When one door closes, another opens.
-- Cervantes, Don Quixote
To pile on to what Bob said those official recession start dates are released months after the fact. So for a trader it is an autopsy so of what value.
Right. Even by the simplest, bare-bones definition of "two down quarters for GDP," which is not the only definition, you won't know it until, well, two quarters -- six months -- have passed, at the very soonest.
It's historical, not current, information.
Bob.
When one door closes, another opens.
-- Cervantes, Don Quixote
IMO the next big thing won't be a recession, but much, much worse. Globally our debt has topped $188 trillion dollars. This to me is just incredible and the system won't be fixed with a simple recession next time.
--------------------------------------------------------
- Trade what you see. Invest in what you believe -
--------------------------------------------------------
Edit: to elaborate and not seem like a troll. Ha! I definitely lean Mises and Austrian, but in the end I’m a JAG...Just A Guy. Economics is more of a hobby. But it’s definitely interesting to watch economic policy around the globe go all-in on more of a top-down approach.