ES futures price increments | Traders Hideout


futures.io - futures trading strategies, market news, trading charts and platforms


Traders Hideout


Discuss day trading practices and futures trading strategies on this forum for all markets. This forum is also for discussing and reviews for brokers, data feeds, and commercial or third party add-ons




 

ES futures price increments

  #3 (permalink)

North Carolina
 
Trading Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader, Tradestation
Favorite Futures: es
 
Posts: 644 since Nov 2011


It was probably designed to make arbitrage more profitable. You would need to look at what the big contract traded (don't know). A wider spread in theory, also, discourages wash trading and encourages liquidity. If it traded in 10th's, just taking a guess here, but small traders would probably get better fills while larger traders might get worse fills. The larger tick size also probably discourages certain types of scalping. With a smaller tick size, a larger trader would move the price more and it would allow possible allow for more market order scalping.

A smaller tick size might also disadvantage manual limit order traders or discretionary traders because the HFT would be able to pull orders and stack orders on more levels. But, keep in mind that the spread doesn't solely determine how much liquidity that will be offered: the overall market dynamics are a big part. Basically, smaller ticks would in theory make market order scalping for small traders more feasible while disadvantaging the smaller trader on the limit order. However, it would also require reducing the built-in trading fees or else your fees would be a higher percentage of the tick size. There are quite a few variables, as you can see. The reason it disadvantages you on the limit order is the HFT would have a lower cost to front you but you get an advantage on the market order if it tightens the spread. There are a lot of variables in play, and I am not sure that anyone knows exactly what would happen: you might get better fills except when you needed them though.

Anyway, it is never going to change: and I wouldn't want the existing contracts to change. But, I would like to see a smaller contract with reduced trading fees about 1/2 to 1/4 the size of the standard emini. This would be useful for the smaller trader.


Last edited by tpredictor; May 9th, 2018 at 05:53 PM.
Reply With Quote