The question of an edge | Traders Hideout


futures.io - futures trading strategies, market news, trading charts and platforms


Traders Hideout


Discuss day trading practices and futures trading strategies on this forum for all markets. This forum is also for discussing and reviews for brokers, data feeds, and commercial or third party add-ons




 

The question of an edge

  #7 (permalink)

Market Wizard
Gits (Hooglede) Belgium
 
Trading Experience: Master
Platform: NinjaTrader, Proprietary,
Broker/Data: Ninjabrokerage/IQfeed + Synthetic datafeed
Favorite Futures: 6A, 6B, 6C, 6E, 6J, 6S, ES, NQ, YM, AEX, CL, NG, ZB, ZN, ZC, ZS, GC
 
rleplae's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,966 since Sep 2013
Thanks: 2,417 given, 5,586 received


kevinkdog View Post
1. no
2. yes


Discretionary traders can indeed have positive expectancy. The approach might be impossible to backtest, though.

Regardless of trading style, you can always use actual real money results to determine expectancy/edge.

Some methods cannot be backtested, and backtests can easily be faked/manipulated/etc. Backtests are definitely not foolproof.

As for your list of discretionary traders, I have my doubts about some of them having an edge (or even trading at all), and I'll leave it at that.

I Agree...
I can even say more..

There can be an 'edge', which by eye-balling the screen is very clear, why long, why short, why don't touch
once you want to quantify it (at least in classic rule-based system) and program it, it becomes very very
difficult as there is always a little 'but', which is evident to the human eye/brain, but when not programmed
it doesn't count...

Today half of my strategies are classic rule based, if / then and work OK
other half are machine learning, artificial intelligence based

I'm currently working on a small new project, and teach my kid (university student) the magic of machine
learning. as a example i hope to illustrate the result of a rules based system compared to a machine learning
system. But on the same concept... The goal of the exercise is : manual, trial/error/optimisation of features
and parameters, compared to automatic feature extraction... will be a good interesting exercise

More to follow this month...

Follow me on Twitter Visit my Facebook Visit my futures io Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 9 users say Thank You to rleplae for this post: