Trend following futures with 10k? | Traders Hideout


futures.io - futures trading strategies, market news, trading charts and platforms


Traders Hideout


Discuss day trading practices and futures trading strategies on this forum for all markets. This forum is also for discussing and reviews for brokers, data feeds, and commercial or third party add-ons




 

Trend following futures with 10k?

  #8 (permalink)

Luxembourg, Luxembourg
 
Trading Experience: Advanced
Platform: TWS
Broker/Data: Interactive Brokers
Favorite Futures: Stocks
 
Posts: 491 since May 2012
Thanks: 1,641 given, 1,148 received


Fenchurch View Post
I agree for the OP. I just had a look at MNF - Micro Nifty and it is just astonishingly thin. I am profitable on ES/CL however I do like the idea of trading corn and such as I believe there is some forecasting skill in this. CL is just news and noise however thick enough to scalp. I did well on copper recently.

I am going to look at commodities more seriously now thank you Grausch!

I think the OP is trying for larger gains holding trades longer. Andreas Clenow is a long-term trend follower which indicates a different style of trading that I think you are thinking of.

As an example, the Turtles had their stops at 2 ATR and risked 2% per trade. If the daily ATR (average true range) of CL is 100 ticks, then the daily $ movement is $1,000. Since the Turtles would placed their stops at 2ATR, the risk on the trade was $2,000 and then working back to a 2% risk per trade, the account size needs to be $100,000 for a single contract of CL. That would then also use the entire risk budget and no more trades could be taken in any other instrument until the CL trade was exited.

However, in recent years trend-followers have started using wider stops and a smaller risk % per trade. Thus, a typical trend following fund could probably only trade 1 CL contract with perhaps $500,000 in capital.

If a trader with a small account wishes to trade the same way as the Turtles, he needs to catch a big trend with his first or second trade. The account does not have a lot of leeway for losses. While most people don't think this is relevant, your best odds of winning money at a casino would be to place a single bet on black (or red) at roulette. The casino has an edge, so gambling there will just lead to losses over time. However, you can negate the casino's edge by just placing a single bet with good odds. If you lose, you at least got it over with quickly.

Small accounts work the same way in trading. Since you can't trade many contracts you can't scale back when things are going badly. Commissions and losses can hurt small accounts much quicker since they have less of a cushion. By focusing on trading less and making wins really count, a smaller account has a better chance of winning. It is just one way to minimize the effect of the house's edge against a small account.

Edit: Low liquidity is not necessarily a bad thing. It makes it easier to spot when a commodity becomes "attractive" for traders again. If you get sudden massive volume spikes, combined with big moves, then that commodity has become "hot". Easier to spot that than in CL, but you may need to wait a couple of years to get these type of trades. However, if you play them correctly, you can get the 100%+ year in one trade.

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to grausch for this post: