Target Trader (www.proequitytrader.com) | Trading Reviews and Vendors


futures.io - futures trading strategies, market news, trading charts and platforms


Trading Reviews and Vendors


Discuss and review vendors of commercial trading products, trading rooms and services, trading indicators or third-party paid add-ons




 

Target Trader (www.proequitytrader.com)

  #27 (permalink)

Membership Revoked
United States of America
 
Futures Experience: Advanced
Platform: NT
 
Posts: 1,149 since Aug 2009
Thanks: 262 given, 473 received


TraderBee View Post
Okay... so being a woman in the trading market is slim and few, but being a housewife as well, I must be a hoax? BS! Well, guess what... I'm a housewife, a mom, and I TRADE! OMG! ludicrous, right??!!!!
Obviously, this male dominated forum is not the right place for me!! I joined to learn more from others, and share my success... I assume that is what this is all about! Do I pitch the product I purchased? damn right. I bought it, it works, I'm happy and it makes me money! Who wouldn't?!?!?!
Guess I will go back to observing, learning, and NOT sharing!

You offered to post your trading statements to support your claims on the success you had with this vendor. So far, you haven't done that. Perhaps you skipped my post about that.

https://futures.io/vendors-commercial-products/4746-target-trader-www-proequitytrader-com-2.html#post55552

I'm afraid without proof, you're really not "sharing" anything. The reason proof is required is because you said a vendor helped you. Experience has shown that people who make claims of extraordinary trading success due to a vendor's methods are not credible. In fact, most are shills. Coupled with the fact this is the only thread you choose to post in further raises the red flag about your intent.

So, instead of getting indignant about any perceived sexists comments from FT, post your statements if you really want help here.


Last edited by Zoethecus; August 19th, 2010 at 02:46 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated 2018-10-18 in 0.08 seconds with 11 queries on phoenix