eminipicks.com feedback | Trading Reviews and Vendors


futures.io - futures trading strategies, market news, trading charts and platforms


Trading Reviews and Vendors


Discuss and review vendors of commercial trading products, trading rooms and services, trading indicators or third-party paid add-ons




 

eminipicks.com feedback

  #15 (permalink)

Elite Member
woodstock, ga
 
Futures Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker/Data: NinjaTrader Brokerage
Favorite Futures: Futures, TF, CL
 
jwhtrades's Avatar
 
Posts: 156 since Feb 2011
Thanks: 548 given, 77 received

Eminpicks

Thanks for your feedback. I decided not to pursue as a guy I converse on a regular basis decided it wasn't for him and I did as well after 10 days free trial in the room. I think perhaps if you have $5,000 to pay for the coaching and were starting from scratch it might be worthwhile but I'm done paying for education, been there, done that, learned some stuff.

All the best,
John


GuyMM View Post
I subscribed to eminipicks about 18 months ago, having access to the indicators and trading room. I find the decision points and line indicator quite accurate and I believe it has an edge in the S&P e-Mini market. The room has value, too, insofar as charts are posted with the indicator plots and the moderator has a DOM clearly showing the limit orders, stops and profit targets. It's not a very sexy place, with lots of hype and action and quite frankly I appreciate the lack of promotional marketing. It's a serious and very transparent room with all questions answered in a straightforward manner. Losses are owned without excuses and wins aren't "high fived."

At the end of the day, the bottom line is, well, the bottom line and eminipicks is profitable for me and a nice addition to other setups I have in my trading bag.

Like any other vendor service give it a free try before you buy and conduct satisfactory due diligence, making certain it is appropriate for your trading and financial goals.


Reply With Quote
 
Page generated 2018-08-16 in 0.07 seconds with 11 queries on phoenix